• GladiusB
    link
    56 months ago

    How does oxygen change on it’s own?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      Well, we call it chemistry, but the forces at play existed long before we even knew to name them.

      • GladiusB
        link
        26 months ago

        I understand. But if it’s isolated it’s considered non reactive. (I manage a hazmat DOT fleet)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Ok? That’s neat, I just fail to see the relevance I guess. A god would be harmless too, if it was isolated from the rest of the universe.

          • GladiusB
            link
            16 months ago

            I’m asking how it’s going to react with stuff. In like a basic chemistry kind of way.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Seems like something a hazmat DOT fleet manager would already know though, so I guess I just don’t know why you’re asking that. And truthfully, I don’t particularly care, as, again, I fail to see the relevance. I mean like, if it’s real chemical kinetic information that you’re after, there are innumerable better sources than the comments section of a meme page on a fringe social media platform. If you’re trying to make a point about my original tongue-in-cheek comparison, feel free to make it.

              • GladiusB
                link
                -16 months ago

                Ok. You can just accept you’re wrong rather than double downing and sounding less educated than you originally did.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  Mmm yes, because “double downing” is a phrase an educated person uses. Got it, lolol.

                  Look, I would totally accept that I was wrong if I knew what you were referring to, but I literally don’t know, you haven’t explained your opinion at all. Like, please! Tell me what you mean! What am I wrong about?

                  • GladiusB
                    link
                    -16 months ago

                    Like totally. Because educated people don’t know modern lingo or anything. No cap. Your argument is so mid.