• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -276 months ago

    Ah, I see, we’ve come from “vote for the lesser evil” to “anyone claiming that the democrats are bad is on Putin’s/the Repuplican’s payroll”.

    Or how else should we interpret that “specifically designed” part?

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      176 months ago

      “Specifically designed” means exactly what you’re saying it means. Nobody said Russians; they said artificial. This article gives a quick overview of what’s been academically analyzed about it, which in my un-expert opinions is a few years’ behind in terms of how it actually works in the modern day:

      Already, there is strong evidence social media is being manipulated by these inflated bots to sway public opinion with disinformation – and it’s been happening for years.

      In 2018, a study analysed 14 million tweets over a ten-month period in 2016 and 2017. It found bots on social media were significantly involved in disseminating articles from unreliable sources. Accounts with high numbers of followers were legitimising misinformation and disinformation, leading real users to believe, engage and reshare bot-posted content.

      I can only speak for my observations on Reddit and Lemmy, but it is absolutely undeniable to me that there are fake users on both platforms who are pushing specific narratives, and I 100% believe that “don’t vote it doesn’t do anything” is one of them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -96 months ago

        Are they saying “don’t vote”, or that voting isn’t as effective as other means for social change. There is a difference.

        • mozz
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          6 months ago
          1. I’m not aware of anyone who is in favor of voting who isn’t also in favor of other means of social change. The conflation of the two (from the “don’t vote” side) is exactly one of those doesn’t-really-make-any-sense-at-all-but-does-produce-the-desired-result-if-carelessly-accepted nuggets of influential logic that I suspect is “specifically designed”
          2. Some of them are saying “don’t vote”, yes
          • @TexasDrunk
            link
            56 months ago
            1. Or they’re saying vote for the “WiFi causes leaky brain” guy which is the same thing as not voting. Although they’re saying that less once he started getting made fun of for having brain worms.
          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -8
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Have you actually looked at that community? You think those are russian bots? Please. 🙄

            • mozz
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              No… but I understand how I might have given that impression. I think the slrpnk community is kind of an outlier in that it actually does have some anti-electoralism that’s a legit outgrowth of honest anarchism, that I honestly don’t really have a problem with. I don’t think that community is bots, Russian or otherwise, no. (Edit: Well… not all bots. I do think there are a couple propaganda accounts on slrpnk but that almost all of the discourse is organic, and the nature of the landscape means that the propaganda can afford to be a lot less obvious.)

              For the most part, I actually think the propaganda accounts on Lemmy are more subtle than coming out and saying “don’t vote.” They say things like, both parties are the same, or “Genocide Joe,” or they could never support a genocide, or it feels so unfair that we have to do this every four years and nothing ever changes, things like that. I just grabbed one random example to answer your question about, are they saying “don’t vote”.

              Do you want me to find an example of something I think is explicit propaganda that is also explicitly saying “don’t vote”? I can do that too; that one maybe poorly chosen example is just the first thing that popped into my mind.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -36 months ago

                No, I don’t want you to do that. As an anarchist, I felt misrepresented, that’s all. But since you say that you don’t have a problem with anarchism, we’re cool.

                • mozz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Yeah, makes sense. Like I say I think I chose my example poorly; it was just the first and most explicit thing that came to mind.