• confluence
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This place would 100% meet the BITE standard of cult classification.

    • HardlightCerealBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      The BITE classification was invented in order to justify hatred of small religions, by taking a word that already had a meaning (cult) and attaching a second, pejorative meaning to it. It’s like if I write a fantasy novel with a species of evil creatures called jews. Jew is already a word, and it’s a horrific act of religious persecution to take a pre-existing word for marginalised religions and spin it into an unrelated negative.

      • confluence
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, because controlling a group’s behavior, information access, thoughts, and emotions is completely acceptable. Autonomy be damned.

        • HardlightCerealBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I didn’t justify the abusive behaviours described by the BITE model. In fact I was very clear that I disliked those behaviours, and their association with an important religious term. You should work on your reading comprehension so you can stop seeing enemies everywhere.

          • confluence
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I apologize for misunderstanding. Can you provide a source or reasoning why you think the BITE classification itself was intended to make “cult” a bad word?

              • confluence
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                That’s an interesting and informative response. I’ll be sure to preface “cult” with “abusive cult” next time. Thanks!