He may not be in office, but Donald Trump has been speaking with the powers that be about Israel’s war on Gaza—but it’s not in an effort to end the genocide.

Instead, Trump has allegedly been talking with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to avert a cease-fire deal, fearing that doing so could help Vice President Kamala Harris win in November, according to PBS.

“The reporting is that former President Trump is on the phone with the Prime Minister of Israel, urging him not to cut a deal right now, because it’s believed that would help the Harris campaign,” said PBS’s Judy Woodruff Monday night. “So, I don’t know where—who knows whether that will come about or not, but I have to think that the Harris campaign would like for President Biden to do what presidents do, and that’s to work on that one.”

  • @SeattleRain
    link
    English
    -3323 days ago

    One is supporting genocide, but the other is actually doing it.

    • @Plastic_Ramses
      link
      3123 days ago

      Id prefer not to support the side that says “finish the job”

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        -1322 days ago

        I’d prefer neither, and in any case I’d still refuse to promise my vote to a party before the election. If Harris wants my guaranteed support she’ll have to start acting like it.

        Now is the best time to push the party left, and genocide is the one issue I absolutely refuse to compromise on.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          822 days ago

          Any vote not for Harris is a vote for Trump because of how our system works. You would be actively pushing closer to the final annihilation of Gaza by not doing everything in your p-

          Oh fuck it. You fucking morons will never understand at this rate. I just hate seeing you pretend you actually give a single fuck about those poor people when you’re just using them to virtue signal

          • knightly the Sneptaur
            link
            fedilink
            121 days ago

            I’m not saying not to vote, I’m saying not to make yourself ignorable. If the DNC knows they have your vote they won’t have any reason to try and earn it.

        • @SonOfMothman
          link
          322 days ago

          In a perfect world maybe, but not how it actually works. Please vote for your best interests. A not vote is that same a vote against your own interests.

          • knightly the Sneptaur
            link
            fedilink
            021 days ago

            I’m not saying not to vote, I’m saying not to make yourself ignorable. If the DNC knows they have your vote they won’t have any reason to try and earn it.

            • @SonOfMothman
              link
              121 days ago

              You said you can’t garauntee you’ll vote for Kamala and that she needs to earn your vote. Also that you shouldn’t be ignored.

              What are you saying? Are you saying there’s a possibility you’ll vote for trump? Because that’s the only other option… unless you don’t vote.

              I guess I’m just confused about how are going to get these people to see you. How are you going to not be ignored? The whole no confidence vote already happened, and the next vote is the only one left

              • knightly the Sneptaur
                link
                fedilink
                021 days ago

                What are you saying? Are you saying there’s a possibility you’ll vote for trump?

                If Trump was able to convince me that he’d stop America’s support for genocide then I would.

                And until Harris can do the same, the Democrats do not have my fealty.

                that’s the only other option… unless you don’t vote.

                That is precisely the risk that the Democrat party is taking. If there is no option for voting against genocide, then people like me might not feel enthusiastic about getting out of the house on voting day.

                I guess I’m just confused about how are going to get these people to see you.

                The same as any organization, public opinion polling:

                The party is well aware that the fraction of their base that wants to stay the course on America’s national support for genocide is a minority.

                That they have not already changed their stance is evidence that they do not see a need to do so. They must be confident that they can win the election without the support of uncommitted voters.

                Bet.

                • @SonOfMothman
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  First off, the only one asking for fealty is the republicans. Second, trump already said “finish the job” so obviously he’s not in favor of a cease fire.

                  Now we’re right back to voting against your own interests. A not vote for Kamala is a vote for Trump(in a tight race like this)…. who supports the genocide fully… “finish the job”

                  You have two options.

                  1. vote for an administration that has called for a cease fire and is working to get it. Not doing a great job at it but the alternative is…

                  2. Vote for the administration that has said “finish the job” fully supporting the genocide and not calling for a cease fire.

                  How are you going to not be ignored? If trump wins because people like you don’t vote you’re definitely getting ignored lol. Actually that mother fucker might thank you for helping him get elected.

                  “If these people won’t do exactly I want then I’m going to make sure I get exactly what I don’t want!” - that’s you, that’s how you sound

                  Even the poll you just posted shows dems are more in favor of a mutually beneficial outcome, as opposed to(not to beat a dead horse but) “finish the job.

                  You want to be seen and heard? get out and protest and vote for your best interests. You want to be ignored? Don’t vote. Not voting gives you literally no skin in the game to complain later

                  Edit:grammar

                  • knightly the Sneptaur
                    link
                    fedilink
                    021 days ago

                    First off, the only one asking for fealty is the republicans.

                    Incorrect. Democrats have been the only ones demanding my vote. Republicans don’t bother trying to convince a “commie queer” like myself.

                    Second, trump already said “finish the job” so obviously he’s not in favor of a cease fire.

                    Likewise, the Democrats who pretend to support a ceasefire but keep authorizing weapons shipments anyway.

                    Now we’re right back to voting against your own interests. A not vote for Kamala is a vote for Trump(in a tight race like this)…. who supports the genocide fully… “finish the job”

                    There’s those demands for fealty again.

                    How are you going to not be ignored?

                    Like this. You’re failing to ignore me right now.

                    “If these people won’t do exactly I want then I’m going to make sure I get exactly what I don’t want!” - that’s you, that’s how you sound

                    “If these people don’t stop asking the Democrats to represent their interests then I’m going to blame them for Trump’s second term” - that’s you, that’s how you sound.

                    It’s as if you’ve already given up on this election and are looking for some “other” to blame so you don’t have to accept the fact that the DNC would rather lose an election than to stop arming Israel.

                    Even the poll you just posted shows dems are more in favor of a mutually beneficial outcome, as opposed to(not to beat a dead horse but) “finish the job.

                    And yet, the Democrats would rather stay the course than to do the thing that would net them more votes. By your own logic, the party is not doing everything it can to maximize its chances in the election.

                    You want to be seen and heard? get out and protest and vote for your best interests.

                    I’m doing exactly that. You’re responding to my protest now. We have an opportunity for productive dialogue and you risk squandering it with manipulative rhetoric. It is not possible to guilt a single-issue anti-genocide voter into tolerating genocide, but it might be possible to convince your political party that it needs to take a more principled stance on the topic.

                    You want to be ignored? Don’t vote.

                    Telling people I’m not going to vote has resulted in far more productive and nuanced conversations like this than a promise to vote ever has.

                    Not voting gives you literally no skin in the game to complain later

                    On the contrary, voters are the ones with no standing to complain, because they voted for it. Only the non-voting majority of Americans can claim that they are not represented by the political establishment.