• justhach
    link
    181
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Kamala Harris Hillary Clinton predicted to win by nearly every major forecaster”

    Its like 2016 never even fucking happened lol

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      312 months ago

      She was predicted to win the popular vote…

      And she did.

      Looking at statewide polling and a lot of battleground states were coinflips.

      The problem was anyone mentioning that got screeched at for wanting trump to win…

        • @givesomefucks
          link
          English
          72 months ago

          I really didn’t think she’d fuck it up this much.

          The last three elections have been like Brewster’s Millions where it’s like the Dem is trying to lose.

      • abff08f4813c
        link
        fedilink
        132 months ago

        She was predicted to win the popular vote…And she did.

        But this article is saying it’s based on the EC,

        Nate Silver’s latest forecast now gives Vice President Kamala Harris a slight edge in the Electoral College
        The model shows Harris securing 271 Electoral College votes to Trump’s 267.

      • snooggums
        link
        English
        142 months ago

        YES (no predictions)

        Honestly there should be zero results posted until all votes are counted. Counting as they come in influences later voters, especially in western time zones.

        I thought there was an election in the not too distant past where the news declared a winner before Hawaii even finished voting.

        • SaltySalamander
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          I disagree with the “no predictions” part, but fully 100% agree with not releasing any results until all votes are tallied.

          • snooggums
            link
            English
            22 months ago

            What would they base predictions on without results?

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator