This LPT doesn’t violate the community rule against illegal advice because in this purely hypothetical scenario the law means nothing
This LPT doesn’t violate the community rule against illegal advice because in this purely hypothetical scenario the law means nothing
When they want to do things.
Four years ago the other party had the same, but they didn’t want to do anything.
Which depressed turnout, and allowed this to happen.
As noted elsewhere in the thread, this is blatantly untrue.
That was you’re own rambling unsourced interpretation…
And now you’re acting like it’s a source?