• Fedizen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Until there’s overt advertising its unlikely to enshittify the normal way. That doesn’t mean it won’t, just that a different capital process is at work. Wikipedia has outlived most of “web2.0” because its funded by donations and run by volunteers.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Until there’s overt advertising its unlikely to enshittify the normal way.

      Trust me we will be deep into that territory so fast it is going to make your head spin.

      Wikipedia has outlived most of “web2.0” because its funded by donations and run by volunteers.

      Private equity and VC funding can’t directly buy Wikipedia and dissect it because it is an at least somewhat functional non-profit organization. That is the only reason.

      • Fedizen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        What would a comparable example be?

          • Fedizen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Twitter was ad driven and was enshittifying before musk bought it, and sold because they were a public company.

            Jay Graber will likely get bored and sell it off or monetize eventually but twitter is definitely not the model here.