@cm0002 to [email protected]English • 5 days agoDark and Darker developer did not commit copyright infringement, court rules, but has to pay Nexon nearly $6 million anywaywww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square10arrow-up174arrow-down10
arrow-up174arrow-down1external-linkDark and Darker developer did not commit copyright infringement, court rules, but has to pay Nexon nearly $6 million anywaywww.pcgamer.com@cm0002 to [email protected]English • 5 days agomessage-square10
minus-square@KellylinkEnglish25•edit-25 days agoWait… How do Trade Secrets work? I thought that the individuals might be in legal trouble if they violate NDAs or No Compete clauses but that once the “secret” was out it was fair game.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish19•5 days agoThe secret was an extraction shooter using DnD Classes. It’s very unique and not derivative at all.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•5 days agoThis has got to be a South Korea specific thing right? I thought game concepts were generally fair game
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•5 days agoI think you’re right but Nintendo’s trying to change that in its fight against Pal World.
minus-square@EvotechlinkEnglish-3•5 days agoI mean, didn’t matter if you build it on a codebase you yoinked
minus-squareMaestrolinkfedilink24•5 days agoThey didn’t yoink the code base. That would be copyright infringement and the judge said they didn’t do that.
minus-square@KellylinkEnglish14•5 days agoIf they stole the code that would be copyright infringement.
Wait… How do Trade Secrets work?
I thought that the individuals might be in legal trouble if they violate NDAs or No Compete clauses but that once the “secret” was out it was fair game.
The secret was an extraction shooter using DnD Classes. It’s very unique and not derivative at all.
This has got to be a South Korea specific thing right? I thought game concepts were generally fair game
I think you’re right but Nintendo’s trying to change that in its fight against Pal World.
I mean, didn’t matter if you build it on a codebase you yoinked
They didn’t yoink the code base. That would be copyright infringement and the judge said they didn’t do that.
If they stole the code that would be copyright infringement.
OpenAI would like a chat