Around the world, progressive parties have come to see tight immigration restrictions as unnecessary, even cruel. What if they’re actually the only way for progressivism to flourish?

That the era of low immigration was also the era of progressive triumph is no coincidence. […] The United States felt more like a cohesive nation to many voters, with higher levels of social trust and national pride, and politicians were able to enact higher taxes on the rich and new benefits like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

  • AatubeOP
    link
    fedilink
    313 hours ago

    besides the part where the country they come from is just generally dangerous.

    That’s exactly what asylum is about and why asylum is a human right. (That said, asylum approval in Denmark is higher than the EU average and doesn’t seem like a problem.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I’m an Atheist who is very acutely aware of where most of the danger in most of these countries comes from. It’s not left behind at the border. It’s also most of what makes conservatives in general dangerous, not just foreign conservatives.

          • AatubeOP
            link
            fedilink
            15 hours ago

            How so? Aren’t those who seek asylum those who disagree with their country’s societal atmosphere? Why would someone impose their beliefs on a radically different place they’ve just settled to?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              You’re completely and utterly ignorant on this.

              Ex-Muslims for example have a LOT of issues with a lot of their “fellow” immigrants who abandoned absolutely none of the beliefs and behaviors that made it difficult to live in their country of origin, including harsh treatment and violence against any Middle Eastern looking person recklessly brave enough to not pretend to be at least moderately religious.

              A sizable portion of immigrants tend not to disagree with the “social atmosphere” of their original country, and tend to move purely for practical, often financial reasons. From what I’ve seen there’s a lot of “Technically this place has better results, but I don’t really agree with how they got there. Too much alcohol, too many sluts and gays, too permissive.” or similar sentiments from that part of the demographic.

            • AwesomeLowlanderM
              link
              fedilink
              23 hours ago

              Because that’s how humans are. I’m an immigrant myself, and trust me I’ve asked myself the same question so many times. People move to get away from horrible conditions in their home country, then immediately set to recreating the factors that caused those horrible conditions in the first place. Most people just don’t make the logical leap between their beliefs and the end results.