• Luffy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 hours ago

    If I told you that I will give you free candy if you get into the back of my white van, would you do it?

    The software is closed source, and Google has got a bad record of privacy. You really think that they won’t do it another time?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 hours ago

      If you’re trying to think through it, you’ve got to think about incentives. Google is in the ads business. They have no reason to want your nudes. It doesn’t help them sell anything to you

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        You might not understand how Google handles data (of unique users or other internet info). Their core businesses model is based on exactly that - they read & record your private data & model ads based on it.

        They won’t just scan your nudes, but all pics (not that nudes don’t contain useful data for Google).

        Maybe I’ll pay Google money to show ads for my capsaicin-based talcum alternative only to people with smooth buttholes. And as I do so (for a modest amount of money per potential client) Amazon will offer you specifically my Chilly lube.

        (And the “local” thing/claim is ofc bs, it can just mean they use your CPU time instead of theirs, but still get the same computed data at the end.)

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      English
      011 hours ago

      Well by that logic using anything Google has ever touched would be insanely out of the question, rendering this article and thread a moot point. I get that this feature sounds sketchy but at some point paranoia should lead you to another platform rather than speculating about something just because it was brought to your attention.