• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15 hours ago

    I’m not sure what you’re saying here. Are you saying the companies that support DEI are taking government subsidies, or that the company(or companies) that abandon DEI of their own will shortly after the American president targeted it are taking government subsidies? And which government are you referring to, America or Canada?

    • Fushuan [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      They are saying that companies that take action the fastest are the ones most scared of losing government funding, implying that since all businesses want is money, government subsidies are a greater part of their income than the actual business itself. They also say that this also implies that those companies will be the ones to fold first when government asks them for anything like user data.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 hours ago

        Yes, but they’re being very non-specific? Which companies? Spotify, Google and Apple, or the ones condemning the removal of DEI? It can be easily read either way.

        • Fushuan [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Them implying that condemining the removal of DEI would cut subsidies is very backwards while the reverse makes sense, so given the context it’s clear in my mind what they meant.

          Or they are crazy idk.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 hours ago

            Them implying Google or Shopify wouldn’t give or sell information to the government, or try to get government subsidies, is also implausible. But if they state their intention, none of us have to guess.