@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 2 days agoFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square269fedilinkarrow-up1639arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected]sffpc[email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1629arrow-down1external-linkFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.com@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 2 days agomessage-square269fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]sffpc[email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•20 hours agoWell, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•3 hours agoBecause you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
minus-square@gruelinkEnglish2•8 hours agoFrom what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.