• @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    14 hours ago

    I just think that (upper) age limits will quickly become rather myopic, and this may happen sooner than most people think.

    I also think term limits is usually a stalking horse for the far right for other matters and I don’t think those outside the far right should fall for it. I think term limits solves nothing and I also think that robs people of incumbents that they love. If people keep choosing the same people to put into office, why the hell not? Most especially if it’s like any other job.

    I think if we solve the actual problems, age and term limits fall by the wayside as the red herring they are for several reasons.

    • @ilinamorato
      link
      115 minutes ago

      I just think that (upper) age limits will quickly become rather myopic, and this may happen sooner than most people think.

      I don’t think it should be a set number. I think it should be pegged to the average life expectancy in the US. That gives them an incentive to make policy that improves lifespan.

      I also think term limits is usually a stalking horse for the far right for other matters

      Even a broken clock can want the right thing for the wrong reasons twice a day. (I think that’s how the saying goes?)

      and I don’t think those outside the far right should fall for it. I think term limits solves nothing

      I think it makes politicians more expensive to bribe.

      and I also think that robs people of incumbents that they love. If people keep choosing the same people to put into office, why the hell not?

      In a functional democracy, sure! But an incumbent has a massive advantage over any challenger, and primarying them almost always fails; even for remarkably unpopular candidates. “Better the devil you know…”

      I think if we solve the actual problems, age and term limits fall by the wayside as the red herring they are for several reasons.

      Maybe. But I don’t know if those problems can stay solved.