The northern Italian city of Padua has started removing the names of non-biological gay mothers from their children’s birth certificates under new legislation passed by the “traditional family-first” government of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.

  • Amilo159
    link
    -581 year ago

    From the article “Surrogacy is illegal in Italy, and gay marriage has not been legalized. Because same-sex relationships aren’t recognized in law, the non-biological parent has to make a special case for legally adopting their child.”

    Makes sense, local government is simply following the law.

    • Beto
      link
      fedilink
      361 year ago

      You realize most atrocities in history were done “just following the law”, right?

      • BombOmOm
        link
        -291 year ago

        Having the birth-parents on the birth certificate is ‘monstrous’? Come now.

        • WalrusDragonOnABike
          link
          fedilink
          19
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As someone who probably would have had to deal with a decade of abuse and neglect as a child if such a change had happened in Texas 20 years ago, I can prefer confidently say yes, it is monstrous.

          • BombOmOm
            link
            -221 year ago

            Who would be abusing you for your birth parents being on your birth certificate? The only people who see that document are the people raising you and the DMV/Passport office.

            • Unaware7013
              link
              fedilink
              141 year ago

              …do you not understand how an abusive parent being on the birth certificate would have legal and custody implications?

              That’s not something that only the DMV/passport office sees, family judges see and may use that to determine custody arrangements, which can lead to abuse. I’m not sure how you managed to ignore the biggest and most obvious implications of changing parentage on the birth certificate.

              • BombOmOm
                link
                -14
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                …do you not understand how an abusive parent being on the birth certificate would have legal and custody implications?

                One’s adoptive parents have full custody, that is the point of adoption.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -11 year ago

                  It’s unfortunate that this community just mass downvotes anyone percieved as going against the approved narrative, even if it’s literally just stating facts.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -21 year ago

              Who would be abusing you for your birth parents being on your birth certificate

              Nobody because he’s just making up random conjecture out of his ass so he can pretend he’s persecuted

        • @dragonflyteaparty
          link
          01 year ago

          That’s not what it said. It said it only allows biological parents and that adoption by same sex parents requires special permission. Please don’t change the argument until something else.

    • Jaysyn
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Makes sense, local government is simply following the law.

      … is what a fascist sympathizer would say in this situation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Hey buddy, fascism isn’t just whenever you don’t actually have the ability to defend your position

      • @dragonflyteaparty
        link
        01 year ago

        Absolutely. So they should be able to ignore the above quoted law.