Some folks on the internet were interested in how I had managed to ditch Docker for local development. This is a slightly overdue write up on how I typically do things now with Nix, Overmind and Just.

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Nix is indeed cool. I just see it as less practical than maintaining a toolchain for devs to use. Seems like reinventing the wheel, instead of airing-up the tires. I could well be absolutely wrong there - my experience is mainly enterprise software and not every process or tool there is used because it is the best one.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I quite like the sound of Nix, every time I touch on it but haven’t really dug in yet. You’re making me really want to though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I just see it as less practical than maintaining a toolchain for devs to use.

      There are definately some things preventing Nix adoption. What are the reasons you see it as less practical than the alternatives?

      What are alternative ways of maintaining a toolchain that achieves the same thing?

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I see it as less practical mainly due to the extant tooling and age/maturity of the project.

        The ways that I’m most familiar with are use of software like Artifactory - basically a multi-repo. Using such a tool, any package or artifact can be readily retained for future use. Then, for builds, one only needs to ensure that it is used as the package source, regardless of type (PyPy, Docker image, binary, RPM, etc).

        Alternatively, one can use individual repos for any relevant package type but that’s a bit more overhead to manage.