• @hihellobyeoh
      link
      201 year ago

      I agree with what you mean, but they do need them as the easiest defense against a slander suit.

      • @TrismegistusMx
        link
        171 year ago

        I’d argue in court that he’s a fascist tyrant. The precedent will be useful.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Problem is so are many of the judges that would theoretically see his case. The theocratic, white ethno-project has been incubating in the United States since the 70s. Democrats are too spineless to attempt to balance the Supreme Court, and all the appointees that have been made to the lower circuits will take time to be felt - time I don’t think the US has before it risks going the way of the Weimar Republic.

      • @Stitch
        link
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Public figures have higher barriers of proof for those accusations than a private individual would

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      The quotation marks are precisely why I changed the headline to something that doesn’t need quotes but is still accurate and won’t open up slander/libel.