• @hihellobyeoh
    link
    202 years ago

    I agree with what you mean, but they do need them as the easiest defense against a slander suit.

    • @TrismegistusMx
      link
      172 years ago

      I’d argue in court that he’s a fascist tyrant. The precedent will be useful.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Problem is so are many of the judges that would theoretically see his case. The theocratic, white ethno-project has been incubating in the United States since the 70s. Democrats are too spineless to attempt to balance the Supreme Court, and all the appointees that have been made to the lower circuits will take time to be felt - time I don’t think the US has before it risks going the way of the Weimar Republic.

    • @Stitch
      link
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Public figures have higher barriers of proof for those accusations than a private individual would