• moistclump
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What’s the other 4? Gravity… and… Light? Kinetic? Magnetic?

    • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago
      1. Strong nuclear force: holds the nucleus of an atom together
      2. Weak nuclear force: responsible for radioactive decay
      3. Electromagnetic force: of charged particles
      4. Gravitational force: attractive force between objects with mass
      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Not all decays are weak-based, though, and not all weak phenomina are directly related to radioactivity. That’s just the only thing a layman has heard of where it’s relevant.

        The strong force only holds atoms together through a sort of trickle-down force, too, but that one feels like splitting hairs.

        • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The person I replied to wasn’t able to name the forces beyond gravity, so I think over-simplification and reduction to specific phenomena they would have heard of is appropriate.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Oh, absolutely. I was adding on for anyone else reading who might appreciate answer gravy. Sorry if it came across as critical of what you wrote, my bad.

    • SheeEttinBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      They’re literally listed in the article

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well, the article currently lists them as: gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force.

        If you’re not familiar, you wouldn’t be able to guess that the last two are nuclear forces and in the context of a new force, that list is rather confusing.

    • cwade12c
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The body of the article lists them, they just aren’t listed in the title.

    • Lord_McAlister
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If I remember there’s weak and strong nuclear force, then two others.

      • SpaceNoodle
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, there’s two others, then the nuclear forces

        • SanguinePar
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think there’s a nuclear force, then two others, then another nuclear force. But I could be wrong.

            • SanguinePar
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yes, but the real nuclear forces were the friends we made along the way.

            • kbotc
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Someone’s trying to connect the dots on a grand unified theory.

              The best ones are all untestable.