• @moistclump
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What’s the other 4? Gravity… and… Light? Kinetic? Magnetic?

    • 133arc585
      link
      fedilink
      371 year ago
      1. Strong nuclear force: holds the nucleus of an atom together
      2. Weak nuclear force: responsible for radioactive decay
      3. Electromagnetic force: of charged particles
      4. Gravitational force: attractive force between objects with mass
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not all decays are weak-based, though, and not all weak phenomina are directly related to radioactivity. That’s just the only thing a layman has heard of where it’s relevant.

        The strong force only holds atoms together through a sort of trickle-down force, too, but that one feels like splitting hairs.

        • 133arc585
          link
          fedilink
          191 year ago

          The person I replied to wasn’t able to name the forces beyond gravity, so I think over-simplification and reduction to specific phenomena they would have heard of is appropriate.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh, absolutely. I was adding on for anyone else reading who might appreciate answer gravy. Sorry if it came across as critical of what you wrote, my bad.

            • 133arc585
              link
              fedilink
              81 year ago

              Gotcha, no problem, I did take it as criticism of my comment but that was a reflex.

    • @SheeEttin
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      They’re literally listed in the article

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Well, the article currently lists them as: gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force.

        If you’re not familiar, you wouldn’t be able to guess that the last two are nuclear forces and in the context of a new force, that list is rather confusing.

    • @cwade12c
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      The body of the article lists them, they just aren’t listed in the title.

    • @Lord_McAlister
      link
      21 year ago

      If I remember there’s weak and strong nuclear force, then two others.

      • @SpaceNoodle
        link
        11 year ago

        No, there’s two others, then the nuclear forces

        • SanguinePar
          link
          11 year ago

          I think there’s a nuclear force, then two others, then another nuclear force. But I could be wrong.

          • @SpaceNoodle
            link
            21 year ago

            Maybe it’s nuclear forces all the way down

            • SanguinePar
              link
              21 year ago

              Yes, but the real nuclear forces were the friends we made along the way.

            • @kbotc
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Someone’s trying to connect the dots on a grand unified theory.

              The best ones are all untestable.