Department of Public Works employee Eric Batman claims that having to see a Progress Pride flag flying outside the department’s Alhambra, California, headquarters during the month of June effectively forces him to “celebrate, recognize, and solemnize conduct and actions that he views as sin” in conflict with his sincerely held Christian religious beliefs, according to a lawsuit filed in March by anti-LGBTQ+ evangelical nonprofit the Liberty Counsel.

  • dejected_warp_core
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Agreed. Plus a legal precedent in favor of pride flags, could cut the other way. On principle, I don’t want to see hateful sentiment yield a legal victory. In practice, disallowing this kind of expression in government facilities would/should keep MAGA flags and other nonsense far from the same flagpoles. Or at the very least, it could be argued so in a second court case.

    • Folstar@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I come to Lemmus for exchanges like this. Well reasoned, level headed, and consequences considered. Imagine if we could get conversations like this to take place in those government buildings- sure would be swell.

    • phx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah. I generally don’t have an objection to pride flags but I could definitely see somebody stretching the same arguments to have a Confederate or MAGA flag (or just Trump’s face as he’s so fond of putting it on fucking everything)

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why should the law treat these things as the same though? If the law is blind to bigotry then that’s a larger problem.

      • dejected_warp_core
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Why should the law treat these things as the same though?

        Good question. I think that the law is going to see a flag on a government flagpole from a “does this represent part of the government or not?” standpoint. In that context, the message the flag sends is irrelevant. In this, and possibly many other cases, it represents a third party that is getting notoriety and support from a government facility. Maybe it’s okay if its declared as an official act by someone that has the power to do so, but then it probably won’t be a one-off like the flag in the article.

        In truth I freaking love that people put a pride flag in such a prominent place. It represents values that align with basic human dignity and are harmless to everyone. I’m just concerned that it’s going to open up a whole can of worms that might make things worse. Then again, things are already pretty bad so clever tactics that exploit loopholes are warranted.

        If the law is blind to bigotry then that’s a larger problem.

        The de-facto environment out there is increasingly so. It is indeed a massive fucking problem.