• Granbo's Holy Hotrod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That is a lot of words that did not mention surveillance state or distopian shit kabob.

    • Kitty@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t think that was a point of the article though.

      • Granbo's Holy Hotrod
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Why are governments and business so keen on getting us to accept AI? Every article that doesnt mention the end goal is survalence state is just a fluff piece to normalize it.

        • Kitty@lemmy.pt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Hey, I agree with you with the surveillance. :)

          I think the point of the article is showing in numbers other aspect of why AI is pushed so hard, and its simply money; how the costs of AI shaped and what can we expect in next years, or maybe even months. The surveillance aspect is widely known and where I agree it should be mentioned, there are different, more important parts that will have bigger impact on our future lives than just lack of privacy.

          Oligarchs put too much money in AI and now they have only one choice: to just go all in with AI to the end. The question is, what will be the end?

          • Granbo's Holy Hotrod
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Fair, I am pissed. I read the whole article and the question, for what hangs very heavy. All this money is moving hands. Its a financial mcguffen. Its whatever you think it is.