Not only does this disincentivize HR from running fake vacancies or stringing multiple candidates on just to keep their options open, but it also solves the problem of unemployed people job-searching effectively working full-time for free. The fact that companies would have to pay to hire workers would mean they try to make the selection as short and effective as possible.

  • bizarroland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Exactly, for every one person who abuses the rule to get 10 hours of labor paid to them in exchange for doing no work, you’ll have 999 people that are actually using the system as intended.

    Are you really the kind of person that’ll fuck over 999 people just to make sure that one person doesn’t get ahead in a sneaky way?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      Are you really the kind of person that’ll fuck over 999 people just to make sure that one person doesn’t get ahead in a sneaky way?

      Are you sure you want to see people’s actual answers to this?

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not to mention, some companies right now are abusing interview candidates to get free work with “trial project” type assignments, or “How would you fix this problem, if you were hired?” type of free consultations. If some candidates abused the companies in return, I’d call that fair play.

    • ttyybb
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      But think of the shareholders. Who’s helping them out?