Statistics Canada confirmed last week that 351,679 babies were born in 2022 — the lowest number of live births since 345,044 births were recorded in 2005.

The disparity is all the more notable given that Canada had just 32 million people in 2005, as compared to the 40 million it counted by the end of 2022. In 2005, it was already at historic lows for Canada to have a fertility rate of 1.57 births per woman. But given the 2022 figures, that fertility rate has now sunk to 1.33.

Of Canadians in their 20s, Statistics Canada found that 38 per cent of them “did not believe they could afford to have a child in the next three years” — with about that same number (32 per cent) saying they doubted they’d be able to find “suitable housing” in which to care for a baby.

A January survey by the Angus Reid Group asked women to list the ideal size of their family against its actual size, and concluded that the average Canadian woman reached the end of their childbearing years with 0.5 fewer children than they would have wanted

“In Canada, unlike many other countries, fertility rates and desires rise with income: richer Canadians have more children,” it read.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -21 year ago

    Good! Maybe we can get back to sane population levels and half of these problems with the housing market and global warming will just resolve themselves. The earth’s population has more than doubled since I was born, and let me tell ya, it’s noticeable. It’s noticeable everywhere I look.

    • Cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      LoL no. Let’s import people to continue Canada’s growth and keep providing cheap labor to Canada’s corporations.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Our form of capitalism requires constant growth. One way to grow profits is to sell to more people.

        If we stop immigration our economy collapses. If we keep it up, lots of other things collapse.

        • Cyborganism
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          That’s the thing. We NEED the opposite of growth. We need a decrease, a decline. Less production, less people.

          Otherwise we all know what’s the alternative. Global irreversible climate disaster and massive death.

      • @systemglitch
        link
        31 year ago

        Which is exactly what will continue to happen.

    • @Son_of_dad
      link
      101 year ago

      All you’re advocating for is a world in which the rich get to have kids and the rest of us get to work until we die, and have no families or lives.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        No, that’s not at all what I said. You just formulated your own scenario and ran with it.

        • @Moneo
          link
          71 year ago

          Could you clarify what you meant? You think it’s a good thing that people cannot afford to have kids?

          • SokathHisEyesOpen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Nope, but I think it’s good that people are deciding not to have kids, especially if they can’t afford them. I think the best scenario is if people can afford kids and still decide not to have them, or only have one of them.