Doug Holland to THE POLICE PROBLEMEnglish • 11 months agoUS Supreme Court declines to hear arguments in Michigan man's 2014 beating and arrest by plainclothes copsweb.archive.orgmessage-square10arrow-up185arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up180arrow-down1external-linkUS Supreme Court declines to hear arguments in Michigan man's 2014 beating and arrest by plainclothes copsweb.archive.orgDoug Holland to THE POLICE PROBLEMEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square10file-text
minus-square@iyaerPlinkEnglish31•11 months agoWhat’s that, the christo-fascist Supreme Court has no problems with cops beating people to death for no reason? Yeah, color me surprised.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•11 months agoThey are too busy taking cases like the one; determining if its illegal to call trump’s penis small.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agoThat can’t be a real thing :( (the case; he obviously has a small peen)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agohttps://www.cnn.com/2023/11/01/politics/trump-too-small-supreme-court/index.html
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoDude, wtf? What is the precedent for this? How is this not free speech?!
minus-square@UnculturedSwinelinkEnglish2•11 months agoDid you not read the article? People making it out like this is a free speech issue when it isn’t. It’s literally about copyright of a design making fun of Trump’s penis size.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoAnd back to the original point. Thank god the Supreme Court is taking cases like this other than some other cases… /s
What’s that, the christo-fascist Supreme Court has no problems with cops beating people to death for no reason?
Yeah, color me surprised.
They are too busy taking cases like the one; determining if its illegal to call trump’s penis small.
That can’t be a real thing :( (the case; he obviously has a small peen)
https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/01/politics/trump-too-small-supreme-court/index.html
Dude, wtf? What is the precedent for this? How is this not free speech?!
Did you not read the article? People making it out like this is a free speech issue when it isn’t. It’s literally about copyright of a design making fun of Trump’s penis size.
And back to the original point. Thank god the Supreme Court is taking cases like this other than some other cases… /s