Long story short, I have a desktop with Fedora, lovely, fast, sleek and surprisingly reliable for a near rolling distro (it failed me only once back around Fedora 34 or something where it nuked Grub). Tried to install on a 2012 i7 MacBook Air… what a slog!!! Surprisingly Ubuntu runs very smooth on it. I have been bothering all my friends for years about moving to Fedora (back then it was because I hated Unity) but now… I mean, I know that we are suppose to hate it for Snaps and what not but… Christ, it does run well! In fairness all my VMs are running DietPi (a slimmed version of Ubuntu) and coming back to the APT world feels like coming back home.

On the other end forcing myself to be on Fedora allows me to stay on the DNF world that is compatible with Amazon Linux etc (which I use for work), it has updated packages, it is nice and clean…. Argh, don’t know how to decide!

Thoughts?

I am not in the mood for Debian. I like the Mint approach but I am not a fan of slow rolling releases and also would like to keep myself as close as upstream as possible, the Debian version is the only one that seems reliable enough but, again, it is Debian, the packages are “old”. Pop Os and similar are two hops away from upstream and so I’d rather not.

Is Snap really that bad?

Edit: thank you all for sharing your experience !

  • BarrierWithAshes
    link
    fedilink
    1211 months ago

    It’s because Ubuntu is a company-backed distro consistently wants to go their own way. Not just snap but they’ve done it before with Unity and Mir (and probably others idk).

    Course Fedora does literally the same thing and doesn’t get any hate for it so idk. It’s just a meme.

    Personally I don’t like Ubuntu because they didnt go far enough into their own ways but thats just me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Course Fedora does literally the same thing and doesn’t get any hate for it so idk. It’s just a meme.

      When have fedora gone their own way ¿? What have they shipped that is not standard on Linux¿? Closest thing I can think is using selinux and firewalld instead of Apparmour and ufw.

      • BarrierWithAshes
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Well they also effectively control development of gnome. Not the exact same way Ubuntu did unity but still comparable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Going for Wayland default is also another example (I can think of).

        Fedora devs do listen to their users, tho.