Is a lighter effective because it’s on fire? Or just because it’s hot?
If you made a lighter that was just as hot as another lighter, would it work just as well even if it had no fire?
Is a lighter effective because it’s on fire? Or just because it’s hot?
If you made a lighter that was just as hot as another lighter, would it work just as well even if it had no fire?
Itll melt the plastic around the socket as they arent designed to tolerate heat anymore.
Thanks for the answer though I’ve seen some metal ones still with the warning label.
Could be chromed plastic
That seems really dumb
Smoking is dumber
Driving off a cliff is even dumber still. Its not a dumbest thing contest though
It wasn’t until you showed up.
Nah, that was all you. Nobody said smoking was a good idea. Just that it’s stupid to create a fire hazard to make a car 0.0001% more profitable. You barged in with a weird non sequitur. I was just pointing it out.
It’s called humor, brainiac.
Was that what it was supposed to be? Don’t quit your day job.
It’s OK, not everybody has the capacity to understand the nuances of language.
You don’t have to light a cigarette with a lighter. What’s truly dumb is forgetting how useful fire is…
Yeah, fire is super handy for all sorts of things while I’m driving a car.
Ah yes, why have the ability to do anything you don’t immediately need to do?! I am a smart person!
We’re talking about lighters in cars, buddy.