An Israeli tank attack on a United Nations center sheltering thousands of displaced Palestinians has killed at least nine people and wounded 75 others in Gaza’s second largest city, senior U.N. humanitarian officials said Wednesday.

  • ???
    link
    010 months ago

    If there is no plausible evidence (and there is), why do you think they found it plausible enough to start a court case?

    • @Potatofish
      link
      -110 months ago

      Just stop. No one will listen to you as long as you have stupid arguments.

      • ???
        link
        110 months ago

        Such civil, much debate! Wow!

        In a 15-2 ruling, the ICJ judges ordered that Israel must prevent the following actions against the protected “group,” which the court defined as the Palestinians of Gaza: “(a) killing members of the group; ( b ) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; © deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and ( d ) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.” While the specific word “ceasefire” was not mentioned in the order, the ruling could not be clearer about the court’s intent. It literally ordered Israel to stop killing Palestinians in Gaza “with immediate effect.” https://theintercept.com/2024/01/26/icj-ruling-gaza-genocide/

        In some years the final ruling will likely be genocide. In the meantime, I have some hope that people like you will see the errors of their ways.

          • ???
            link
            110 months ago

            So I’ll ask you again, why this initial ruling to tell Israel to stop this, if it wasn’t plausible to consider it and try it as genocide? 🤔

            It helps if you explain to others instead of calling them stuff or giving non answers.