You mean the zero evidence Israel has presented to back up any of their UNRWA helping Hamas claims?
Diplomats who saw the OIOS preliminary report said it contained no new evidence from Israel since the initial presentation of the claims in January – which were not backed by any proof. In summarising the findings, the UN spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, confirmed that the investigation had yet to receive corroborating material from Israel.
zero looks different. Acting as if no such thing happened is extremely odd given the large amount of people working there. The Economist gets it right:
It is hardly surprising that some members of an organisation that has been embedded in Gaza so deeply and for so long have links to Hamas. But that defence of UNRWA in turn raises difficult questions about whether it is sufficiently neutral, transparent and accountable.
We have witnesses and videos of them helping Hamas, there is no need to “coerce” anyone. What a joke.
You mean the zero evidence Israel has presented to back up any of their UNRWA helping Hamas claims?
zero looks different. Acting as if no such thing happened is extremely odd given the large amount of people working there. The Economist gets it right:
And who’s “we”? Are those witnesses in the room with us right now?