Ultragigagigantic to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 year agoBring out the rule bookimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1799arrow-down117cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1782arrow-down1imageBring out the rule bookUltragigagigantic to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square86fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareMotoAshlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down8·1 year agoBy not having immunity from equitable rules and by not having the ability to just make shit up and arrest people for it? This isn’t rocket science. Enforcers CAN be subject to rules too, regardless how much US police are not.
minus-squaremelpomenesclevage@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·1 year agoThat’s delusionally… Both optimistic and pessimistic at the same time?
minus-squareMotoAshlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·edit-21 year agoIt’s only delusional if you assume what kind of enforcer I would approve of.
minus-squaremelpomenesclevage@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoBut you don’t really get to choose. That’s kind of the point.
minus-squareMotoAshlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·1 year agoNot talking about the real world. Talking about what anarchists would want. Not what they’d get.
minus-squaremelpomenesclevage@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoYou don’t even understand the premise of what youre talking about and I’m too tired to try explaining to someone who probably doesn’t want to know.
minus-squareMotoAshlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoYou all the ones confusing rule makers with rule enforcers, yet you accuse me of not understanding. Stop being so fucking dumb and maybe your claims of me not understanding would have any merit.
minus-squaremelpomenesclevage@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoAgain, youre so completely missing the point.
minus-squareMotoAshlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 year agoI am the one making the point, moron.
By not having immunity from equitable rules and by not having the ability to just make shit up and arrest people for it?
This isn’t rocket science. Enforcers CAN be subject to rules too, regardless how much US police are not.
That’s delusionally… Both optimistic and pessimistic at the same time?
It’s only delusional if you assume what kind of enforcer I would approve of.
But you don’t really get to choose. That’s kind of the point.
Not talking about the real world. Talking about what anarchists would want. Not what they’d get.
You don’t even understand the premise of what youre talking about and I’m too tired to try explaining to someone who probably doesn’t want to know.
You all the ones confusing rule makers with rule enforcers, yet you accuse me of not understanding. Stop being so fucking dumb and maybe your claims of me not understanding would have any merit.
Again, youre so completely missing the point.
I am the one making the point, moron.