• FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    -9
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    That’s not how it works.

    You’re enabling Trump’s bullshit.

    It’s (stochastic) terrorism and you’re just like “but dude! It might not stick!”

    Wonder what you say when trump’s cultist kill off witnesses and jurors?

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      English
      177 months ago

      You’re enabling Trump’s bullshit.

      No, this random commenter on Lemmy is absolutely not enabling Trump’s bullshit. We’re just trying to explain the behavior of the judge, we have nothing to do with it.

      It’s (stichadtic) terrorism and you’re just like “but dude! It might not stick!”

      Stochastic terrorism is, obviously, what they’re trying to avoid with the gag order. The judge and his family are already victims, and he knows full well that the jury and witnesses are at risk. No offense intended, but I suspect he understands the situation he’s in better than you do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      So you would rather see him not face any consequences for the crime he has committed except for a weekend in jai, all out of principle?

      • @Dkarma
        link
        37 months ago

        That’s not what would happen tho. The trial wouldn’t end if Trump is held I contempt.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          07 months ago

          It would allow him to stall everything by opening the door to questioning the judge’s neutrality and missing would move forward before he got elected again.

          You guys are wishing to see him held in contempt even if it means he probably won’t see any other jail time after that, I’m close to the point where I’ll start to think you’re on his side and just want to see him win.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        -77 months ago

        So you’re okay with terrorism.

        Oh look, I can play that game too! The process is meant for the judge to be neutral. Any other position risks the validity of the trial.

        Your argument flies in the face of justice.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          And in this specific case to be able to prove it wasn’t out of spite they have to be able to prove that Trump was given the opportunity to learn from his mistakes. They could send him to jail right away, all that would lead to is their neutrality being questioned and a high risk of the trial being pushed back to a later date or cancelled altogether and the judge could say “I was being neutral” all they wanted, the end result would be worse than if they just wait until they reach a point where their neutrality cannot be questioned.

          So again, I will ask, would you rather see Trump spend a weekend in jail and the trial ending or would you rather see Trump being fined and the trial reaching its conclusion?

          These are the choices we’re presented with right now, not the unicorn world you live in where Trump spends the weekend in jail after one offense and the trial then goes on as intended.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            English
            -37 months ago

            Total bullshit.

            Trump has been warned ad nauseam in this one case alone. If he’s that unable to follow simple directions… he’s mentally unfit to stand trial.

            Pretending like he needs to get fined for contempt before being locked up is an egregious affront to the justice system.

            Literally no one else would be allowed such leeway; and there is only one code of law- it applies to everyone or it’s a joke.

            That trump was ever allowed to make the judge’s own daughter a victim of terrorism… raise severe questions.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              There is only one code of law that applies to this case and it states that the judge can either impose a fine of maximum 1k for each count or jail the person, so the judge is doing exactly what the code of law allows them to do.

              You’re still not answering the question.

              Jail for the weekend at the risk of seeing him go scot-free OR fines and you’re sure the trial reaches its conclusion?

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                English
                -37 months ago

                You didn’t answer mine but demand I answer yours ? Are you okay with witnesses and jury dying because of the terrorism?

                To answer yours… let me ask another. What happens if the case is lost because of the blatant witness tampering? Same result.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  So you’re ok with Trump just going in jail for the weekend, alright.

                  If you think there’s a risk of witness and jury dying then what the fuck do you think will happen if he spends a weekend held in contempt? You think things will calm down after that and his base will go “Yeah, he deserved that”???