Alt text:

They’re a little cagey about exactly where the crossover point lies relative to the likelihood of devastating effects on the planet.

  • Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    579 months ago

    Wikipedia (Near-Earth Supernova) says that a 25 ly away supernova would wipe out half the ozone layer so that’s probably the lower bound for what we want

  • @Balthazar
    link
    English
    159 months ago

    Pretty sure the curve should turn up on the right side at some point.

    • @NegativeInf
      link
      English
      89 months ago

      Nah, happiness should asymptotically approach 0 happiness as distance increases, due to decreased brightness. Tho, I guess there could be a discontinuity at the crossover point of where we can no longer observe it and the happiness we can extract from understanding that there are those so far away we can never see them?

      • @OhmsLawn
        link
        English
        89 months ago

        There’s something to be said for very early supernovae. I’m sure they’d all be giddy for something beyond 13 billion light-years (or whatever that works out to in red shift).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        At some distance, we can no longer see the stars or even the galaxy. A supernova will allow us to see in really distant past, maybe at the first generation with some really good lensing.

        Think ereandel but older

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        If we somehow discovered a supernova (or anything, really) beyond the observable universe, I believe the astronomers would be very very happy.

  • @_lilith
    link
    English
    29 months ago

    Astronomer on a planet just a little too close: “This is a cool way to die”