Judge Aileen Cannon expressed skepticism in court Friday when special counsel Jack Smith’s legal team argued against a ruling they’ve described as a potentially dangerous blunder.

Cannon presided over a federal court conference in Fort Pierce, Florida, to discuss her order, challenged by Smith, to unseal sensitive materials in former President Donald Trump’s classified document case, Lawfare’s Anna Bower reports.

“No decision from the bench,” Bower wrote on X. “But Cannon sounded skeptical of prosecutors’ claims that she clearly erred.”

“Clear error” are the words Smith used in a filing early last month to describe Cannon’s decision on handling discovery in a case that could involve more than 5,000 pages of classified documents.

  • FenrirIII
    link
    1477 months ago

    It’s not an error. She is clearly biased, should be removed from the case, and barred from ever holding public office again.

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      It’s an error but not a mistake. An error is simply when something has gone wrong. Intentional fuckery can cause errors.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1227 months ago

    That’s all well and good, but I feel like she’s done like 10x what it would take a judge to normally get pulled from the case and she’s still in it, so I’ll celebrate when she actually gets removed and censured

  • @Boddhisatva
    link
    100
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Okay, time to appeal and ask the 11th Circuit to remove her from the case. This is a glaring departure from responsible jurisprudence. She is now willfully putting witnesses and others at risk. Exposing those witnesses names and the essence of their testimony puts them at immediate risk of harassment from Trump’s red-hat hordes at minimum, and likely even personal risk for them and their loved ones.

    • @MotoAsh
      link
      297 months ago

      They’ll probably wait until someone on their team is literally murdered by someone screaming, “Trump is king!” or something. People have proven time and time and time again to be underestimating of evil people, yet continue to underestimate. They think the mere existence of laws deters bad people like it does “good” people.

      • @Viking_Hippie
        link
        137 months ago

        They think the mere existence of laws deters bad people like it does “good” people.

        Why doesn’t someone just make crime illegal? Problem solved!

    • @hdnsmbt
      link
      167 months ago

      They’re probably hoping for just that. It would mean further delays.

  • Silverseren
    link
    fedilink
    17 months ago

    Is the judicial branch allowed to order the release of classified materials?