• @ccunning
    link
    1964 months ago

    You should aim to drink at least 2 quarts (2 liters) of urine every 24 hours, and your urine should be light in color.

    I keep drinking my urine, but it just keeps getting darker and darker with each pass 😭

    • @Jenkinsass
      link
      854 months ago

      It doesn’t say your urine, just 2 liters of urine. You gotta mix in other people’s to keep it fresh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -64 months ago

        I remember learning in boot camp that if you run out of water and have to resort to drinking urine, you can always drink someone else’s without concerns once. But your own urine will always be a poison because it contains the waste your kidneys create. Since everyone is different, other people’s isn’t recognized as full of identified waste and so you can probably get away with drinking it. Still a last resort.

        • @ShunkW
          link
          234 months ago

          That’s some of the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard. 100% not true.

          • @jaybone
            link
            34 months ago

            That commentor is probably an AI.

      • @lugal
        link
        234 months ago

        Buy my healing stone for 10.000$

  • Toes♀
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    994 months ago

    That’s a lot of pee to drink, I’ll need donations

  • Lord Goose
    link
    fedilink
    524 months ago

    I swear, I can’t tell the difference between AI answers and the shit people make up with inspect element for the memes anymore.

    • @bitwaba
      link
      154 months ago

      The problem with AI isn’t that it’s not smart enough. The problem is it’s trained on data generated by humanity, which is mostly composed of idiots.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Imagine the smartest person alive. Then remember 100% of the people generating AI training data are dumber than that person.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        Common mistake. You know that if you drink too much urine, there will be nothing left to piss, right?

    • Fishbone
      link
      194 months ago

      And that’s definitely the most unhinged thing the AI said in OP’s image.

    • @mynameisigglepiggle
      link
      14 months ago

      To be fair every time I give Gemini a go it’s hot garbage.

      But then 4o seems to be worse than gpt4. Just feels like it’s regurgitating garbage

  • bquintb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    454 months ago

    Sticking with Brawndo. It has what plants crave.

    • @IHawkMike
      link
      64 months ago

      Do you even know what an electrolyte is?!

    • Orphie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      God dammit, I watched that movie for the first time like a month ago (my housemates wanted to watch it with me) and since then I’m (apparently) suddenly seeing references for the first time

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    334 months ago

    We should start poisoning the LLMs by spreading misinformation in online spaces. That would be funny i think

    • @db2
      link
      584 months ago

      That’s happening organically anyway.

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      94 months ago

      Keep it on non-dangerous topics and I’m with ya lol

      • @ashok36
        link
        34 months ago

        It’s pretty much sterile if you have a catheter. That’s why the joke in Dodge ball about Patches drinking his own piss works so well. He’s a cripple, so he has a catheter, so “it’s sterile and I like the taste!”.

      • AWildMimicAppears
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        yeah, that myth is constantly popping up. it’s just that whatever bacteria live in your bladder just dont grow outside of it, and thats what makes it look “sterile” if you just check with standard media.

        Thats also an issue with everything growing in the stomach, like heliobacter pylori - you have to provide the living conditions of the inside of the stomach to grow and keep a sample for research.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    244 months ago

    Having had kidney stones, I think I got to a point before they finally gave me some fentanyl that I would have been willing to try it if it would have made the pain stop.

    • @theangryseal
      link
      74 months ago

      I’ve had kidney stones (I think) for two or three years now. It fucks off for a bit, comes back, gets infected, fucks my immune system up, then gets better.

      I guess that fucker is too big to get down to where the extreme pain comes in.

      I’m an idiot. I should have dealt with it already, but I seen my poor grandpa and uncle suffer once it started moving. I believe I’d rather die.

      • @somethingp
        link
        19
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The pain is a lesser problem than getting chronic kidney infections. If you know the stones are the cause, you need to see a urologist to figure out a solution. Recurring inflammation from the stones and infections can cause more and more problems as you age, and may potentially affect your renal function down the line.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        124 months ago

        I think they can use ultrasound to break them up so you can pass them if they’re too large to pass. Mine was small enough that I passed it after a few days thankfully.

        • @theangryseal
          link
          54 months ago

          That’s the part I’m avoiding. Passing them. :p

          I’m stupid.

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            74 months ago

            That was the least bad part for me.

            • @theangryseal
              link
              54 months ago

              Maybe I’m being scared of nothing and I’m tougher than I think to be dealing with it this long.

              My uncle literally fell to the ground and said, “my gut has busted, I’m going to die right here.”

              He’s the toughest son of a bitch I’ve ever known.

                • @theangryseal
                  link
                  24 months ago

                  No pain meds for me. That’s part of the problem. I’m an ex junkie in a medication assisted treatment program for a decade or more. I just gotta deal with it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    234 months ago

    So I guess the answer is to drink something coming off a pristine mountain. Some dew, perhaps?

    • @Maalus
      link
      44 months ago

      The answer is not to drink piss

  • @x0x7
    link
    184 months ago

    It’s the rule of modern engineering. You will always be served the worst possible product that can claim to have some utility. If it’s not on the edge of being useful someone didn’t engineer hard enough.

    • Kogasa
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      That’s not necessarily wrong, but not the big explaining factor here I think. The technological challenges behind aligning ML models with factual reality aren’t solved, so it’s not an engineering decision. It’s more that AI is remarkably easy to market as being more capable than it is

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        To expand: I feel like it should be emphasised more that current “AI” models are, at best, hallucinating.

        Their output may look real enough and for some purposes they may be perfectly suitable, but ultimately, they have no concept of the semantic objects related to the words they learn and the semantic relationships between those objects. Without that, they can’t possibly guarantee that the implied semantic connection of the combination of words they produce aligns with the actual relationships.

        You can use a LLM to help translate bullet points into text of a given tone (like abstracts for theses that sound scientific), but you’ll still have to check the factuality and consistency of those texts. When using them to write texts about something you already know, that’s doable and can save you some work. But using it like in the OP to aggregate and present “new” facts without supervision is dangerous, because you can’t actually verify what you don’t already know.

        But “Copilot can scrape your data to give you some pointers and spare some of the tedium of finding it yourself, but you shouldn’t take it for gospel truth” doesn’t quite sell as nicely as “Microsoft Copilot leverages the power of AI to boost productivity, unlock creativity, and helps you understand information better”.