• @_different_username
    link
    English
    446 months ago

    Works that cannot be recovered by readers are cited in the text as personal communications. Personal communications include emails, text messages, online chats or direct messages, personal interviews, telephone conversations, live speeches, nonarchived social media livestreams (e.g., Instagram Live, Twitter Spaces), unrecorded webinars, unrecorded classroom lectures, memos, letters, messages from nonarchived discussion groups or online bulletin boards, and so on.

    • @barsquid
      link
      176 months ago

      This is so cool but I guess there needs to be an entity to attribute it to? Like (Biblically Accurate Angel, personal communication, May 29, 2024).

  • @axemurber
    link
    206 months ago

    Officially, create an appendix, describe your research and method in there, clarify that it is a dream, then refer to set appendix like this: “in my mind scale(appendix 1)”.

  • @NeptuneOrbit
    link
    186 months ago

    Parallel construction. Go find someone else who discovered the same thing and cite that. Easy peasy.

  • @gibmiser
    link
    66 months ago

    Copilot In APA 7 format, personal experiences like a vision you had are considered personal communications. Since personal communications are not recoverable data, they are not included in the reference list but can be cited in the text. To cite your vision, you would include your initials and surname, along with the phrase “personal communication,” and the date of the experience. Here’s an example of how you might cite it:

    Narrative citation: J. Doe (personal communication, May 29, 2024)

    • Hildegarde
      link
      13
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      As an AI, copilot is very experienced with hallucinations, so its probably right on this.

      • Midnight Wolf
        link
        English
        36 months ago

        This guy/gal/sentient being right here, they are doing things that mere mortals cannot fathom. You shall go far, young one.

  • @adam_y
    link
    English
    46 months ago

    Sounds like a phenomenological situation … Or as we like to call it in the sciences, “not science”.