• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    165 months ago

    Ah Its expensive to make it availiable to everyone. Oh yeah we need money for peer reviews too haha

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 months ago

      It’s so strange because publishing on the Internet is close to free, and I swear one of my peer reviewers lacked basic reading comprehension.

      • @123nope567
        link
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not strange at all if it’s the german Springer company this refers to, they’re basically the Murdoch Empire, just publishing their stuff in German, so greed is in their DNA

  • RBG
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The problem is they base that number on the already massively inflated profits they made before going open access. The only reason they have to go open access is if they are not making a deficit in profit.

    Funny enough, they are still double dipping in most cases because you still have to pay the subscription to access all the non-open access papers.

  • @CluckN
    link
    English
    115 months ago

    FOUR HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS

  • @iAvicenna
    link
    English
    55 months ago

    proceeds to justify the cost of unpaid peer reviewed digital publishing using pie charts and bar plots

  • Mr. Satan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55 months ago

    What’s stopping researchers from forming their online community and just putting their work on a forum?

    • SalamanderM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      Publishing in a more prestigious journal usually means that your work will be read by a greater number of people. The journal that a paper is published on carries weight on the CV, and it is a relevant parameter for committees reviewing a grant applicant or when evaluating an academic job applicant.

      Someone who is able to fund their own research can get away with publishing to a forum, or to some of the Arxivs without submitting to a journal. But an academic that relies on grants and benefits from collaborations is much more likely to succeed in academia if they publish in academic journals. It is not necessarily that academics want to rely on publishers, but it is often a case of either you accept and adapt to the system or you don’t thrive in it.

      It would be great to find an alternative that cuts the middle man altogether. It is not a simple matter to get researchers to contribute their high-quality work to a zero-prestige experimental system, nor is it be easy to establish a robust community-driven peer-review system that provides a filtering capacity similar to that of prestigious journals. I do hope some alternative system manages to get traction in the coming years.

      • anar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        Reputation comes from public, it requires collective action and coordination. Collective action is not easy, but it is not as hard it might seem either. For example, many open source projects in software are highly reputable without a private ownership.

  • @Blue_Morpho
    link
    English
    25 months ago

    What’s the meme origin?

    I found a band called Flake Michigan that maybe was the source but I don’t have Instagram to confirm.