The European Parliament is still in its summer recess until 1 September. The European Youth Forum has used the summer break to take a closer look at the young MEPs under the age of 35 in each country.

It is particularly remarkable that five countries did not elect any members under 35 to parliament, namely Belgium, Ireland, Latvia, Luxembourg and Romania.

Are you surprised that there are so few young MEPs in the European Parliament? How could the representation of young voices be improved?

Source: Youth Forum, as of August 2024

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      184 months ago

      All current 27 EU members combined. Some statistics use EU-28 to keep the statistics compareable with pre Brexit numbers. However in this case that it does not make sense.

      • macniel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        I see. The one who made that graphic could have been a bit more descriptive as all diagrams were based on country. Why the combined value amidst those? It’s rather confusing.

        But thanks for the explanation.

        • aasatru
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          For better or for worse, it’s a pretty common way of doing it. Having it presented among the other countries in this graph makes it very quick to check if a country is better or worse than the EU average.

    • @copd
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      Meh I wouldn’t want anyone under 25 speaking in parliament. 35 is a good boundary to consider being “young” for such an elite political position

      • trollercoaster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 months ago

        What makes old people better than young people for such a great “elite political position”? Deserve younger people no proper representation in parliament? And no, older people can’t adequately represent young people, because they lived their youths long ago, under entirely different circumstances.

        Also, if we have such an aggressive age cap towards lower ages, shouldn’t we have an age cap towards higher ages, too? I am above that proposed age cap of yours, yet I am sick of being governed by a bunch of borderline senile geezers.

        • @systemglitch
          link
          English
          -24 months ago

          I’m okay with a cap on both ends. 40-60 would be my age range.

          • trollercoaster
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I am getting why you’re arguing for a cap at the low end, but with present day full-time career politicians, 40 year old career politicians don’t really have any more real life experience than 22 years old career politicians, because all they have ever done for a living was being a career politician.

  • @systemglitch
    link
    English
    -74 months ago

    Should it be improved? Youth and ignorance are old bedmates. Social media has taught me exactly how dangerous it is for societies most inexperienced and naive having the loudest voice.

    • trollercoaster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      134 months ago

      Ignorance is a problem with all ages. Social media are also frequented by older people, who will equally (or even more) easily fall for misinformation. Especially with career politicians, having predominantly older people in high positions is detrimental, because they have been living in the career politician bubble for a very long time and are even more out of touch with normal people’s everyday lives and problems than their younger counterparts.

    • @Phegan
      link
      English
      24 months ago

      Age and being out of touch are bed mates too. It should be representative of our population.