• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 day ago

    what’s thr point of new shiny youtube clients if they’re all dependent on a single method/backend ?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      To say it was written in Rust & make it someone’s portfolio piece so they can use a Microsoft GitHub link on their Microsoft LinkedIn profile.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 day ago

    Wut. If you want an alt YT client, you need the opposite of rusty. You need to update it every week to fight the constant cat and mouse game

    • TwinTusks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      Youtube have been cracking down on all sort of third party clients lately.

      • chebra
        link
        fedilink
        52 days ago

        @TwinTusks @w00t

        Looks like yesterday Youtube simply stopped serving the format 22 (ytdl -f22, IIRC that was 480p video+audio) on all videos, so now anything that had this format selected as default is failing (@invidious). -f18 is still there (360p).

        • TwinTusks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 days ago

          Interesting, but I been having issues with frontends for days now,

      • @MigratingtoLemmy
        link
        English
        11 day ago

        They’re locking down on IPs which consume traffic like a bot/ alternate distribution platforms like Invidious instances. AFAIK the softwares itself isn’t blocked. Please try and correct everyone you see on this forum who says otherwise

        • chebra
          link
          fedilink
          21 day ago

          @MigratingtoLemmy you are wrong though. They are adding tokens and signatures, without them the videos aren’t playing. But I just updated my invidious and it’s playing fine again => it’s not an IP block (yet), it is a change in the youtube media api, so the players need to be changed too = effectively a player block.

          • @MigratingtoLemmy
            link
            English
            11 day ago

            TBH unless this is a coordinated effort against Invidious and other apps or should affect a lot of other things too. Or does this change not affect embedded media in pages?

              • @MigratingtoLemmy
                link
                English
                11 day ago

                Oh well. Thanks for correcting me. I guess they’re trying to play hard

                • chebra
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 day ago

                  @MigratingtoLemmy Yup, there are even some similarities from the Twitter/Nitter fight - tracking tokens, IP blocks, API limits, … Get ready for youtube requiring login to watch videos.

  • @steeznson
    link
    -11 day ago

    RustyTrombone: An unusual musical instrument. (Urban Dictionary)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 days ago

        FreeTube streams from googlevideo. This app is a frontend for Invidious AFAICT. Different stuff. Streaming googlevideo directly is the only method that works properly on 1080p+. Also, this doesn’t work.

        • melroy
          link
          fedilink
          22 days ago

          yea correct. This app seems to be interacting with Invidious. Keep in mind that Google is changing their videos to embed ads soon in their video streams.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            Nothing wrong with Invidious and everyone will need to use it when the ad injections start but claiming your app is better than FreeTube because it’s written in Rust makes no sense when it can’t ever stream in the same quality consistently.