GOAT

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 hour ago

    First we have to figure out how that"online gaming" thing works, because we’re busy suing people.

  • Valentine Angell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    149 hours ago

    Shit on Nintendo being “behind the times” and patent litigation, but they are the console I always have the most fun with. I pick up my Switch everyday, the Xbox and PS grow dust. That’s just me, maybe I’m just too simple…

    • Jolteon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73 hours ago

      I have no problem with them being behind the times, if they even are. What’s really annoying is suing people for downloading games that they don’t even sell anymore.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Or suing people because they advertised their product for them. That one has never made sense.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Unfortunately the one behavior negates the other. How can I have fun with their products knowing that I could face legal action simply because I share my love of their games?

      No sod that, I guess their games don’t get streamed then. There are plenty of companies that are happy about the free advertising, or at least don’t care either way.

    • LiveLM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 hours ago

      Tbf the fact that it’s a portable probably helps, if only the competitors would release a proper portable instead of a streaming tablet…

  • @einlander
    link
    English
    22
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    They wouldn’t, you can’t claim ownership of AI generated material in many places. So for such a litigant company AI is a no go.

  • @BetaBlake
    link
    English
    2813 hours ago

    That direction is litigation via patent trolling

  • @mhague
    link
    English
    1312 hours ago

    They’re still figuring out the internet

  • @ampersandrew
    link
    English
    7118 hours ago

    That direction is straight toward the courthouse.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1918 hours ago

      Well you did think about Mario that one time so surely they have a case.

      Nintendo probably think breathing within 500 km of one of their products constitutes copyright violation.

      • @NegativeLookBehind
        link
        English
        43 hours ago

        You typed his name. We’ll see you in court, asshole

        - Nintendo

    • @JusticeForPorygon
      link
      English
      718 hours ago

      I mean the way some companies have been using AI they’ll be headed that way anyway.

  • @TK420
    link
    English
    3418 hours ago

    Refreshing a company is not jumping on the hype train

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1218 hours ago

      Realistically they weren’t going to, were they?

      They’re not a big tech company, not really, there’s no reason they would have the necessary compute to develop an AI in the first place so what they’re really announcing is that something that no one expected them to do is not going to happen.

      In similarly news, Crayola are not going to develop an AI.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1217 hours ago

        That said, they’re not likely to license an already made AI for their projects either, which is also nice.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I didn’t really expect them to do that either, because what would it do?

          The reason companies like Google are developing an AI is because they have a lot of processor capacity anyway, so they can make use of it and they have a broad enough product catalog that it fits with their current offerings.

  • Björn Tantau
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1519 hours ago

    Note that he didn’t say that Nintendo is going in a different direction.

    • @CosmoNova
      link
      English
      1017 hours ago

      He can’t decide that and is purely speaking from a perspective of a (legendary) game dev with more experience than some studios have as a whole. He’s been longer in the game than almost anyone else for better or worse.

    • @JamesFire
      link
      English
      23 hours ago

      If I wanted good hardware I’d build a PC. Which I did.

      If I wanted good games, I’d build a PC, buy a switch, and sail the seas for anything those can’t run natively that I actually want to play. Which I did.

    • @MSids
      link
      English
      1512 hours ago

      Over the years I’ve gotten rid of every console except for my Nintendo consoles. Sure their hardware is not cutting edge but I don’t really care because I always enjoy myself when I play my Nintendo consoles.

      If you want the 202[3/4/5] version of COD at 4k 60fps then an Xbox is probably more suited to you. Nintendo just isn’t going after that segment. The variety is a good thing.

    • @Num10ck
      link
      English
      410 hours ago

      who would you say has made better games than Nintendo? cuz if you go by sales numbers or ratings, you might consider shutting tf up

  • mechoman444
    link
    English
    -1716 hours ago

    This reminds me of when IBM rejected the idea of the internet.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        That’s only was possible because of the invention of Fusion power.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    017 hours ago

    Its Nintendo. They are always a decade behind on new technology.

    Come 2032 or so they are going to be all about how great this technology that lets them create custom VAs for all their characters (so they never have another Marinet situation) is amazing.

    • @SkunkWorkz
      link
      English
      23 hours ago

      They are not behind. Since they are not trying to catch up with Sony or MS. They purposely choose to use cheaper hardware and go a different direction. That’s not the same as being behind.

      It’s their Blue Ocean strategy. They don’t want to compete directly against Sony and a trillion dollar company called Microsoft. Since the last time they did that it almost took the company under. They make a profit on each Switch sale since the first one was sold and they offer an entirely different gaming catalog that targets a different audience.

    • @anlumo
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Nintendo used to be ahead of the curve with the N64, but you’re right that they’ve been trailing behind for a while now. The Switch still uses the Nvidia Tegra X1 CPU/GPU, which was released in 2015.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      Do you mean the voice of Mario…?

      I do not want an AI voice to puppet his corpse for the next 150 years.