Is Musk competing with Zuck for the worst branding ever?

  • magic_lobster_party
    link
    fedilink
    511 year ago

    Meta’s rebranding at least makes sense. The company has been more than Facebook for a long time, so collecting everything under a different umbrella isn’t too far fetched. Facebook still exists as a product, so they haven’t thrown away all the brand value. Google did kind of the same with Alphabet.

    Rebranding Twitter to X doesn’t make sense at all.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      But they’re not just re-branding. Twitter is now under some kind of corporate shell company. I haven’t seen much coverage of that, but my suspicion is that it’s intended to act as some kind of insulator to contain Twitter’s debts.

      Like when they break a company into pieces and put everyone’s debts and no assets into a single part and then that part declares bankruptcy and all the debt magically goes away, leaving everything else with lots of assets and no debts and a future that looks really rosy. I can’t help but think that this is something similar to that.

      • @RGB3x3
        link
        151 year ago

        Wow, I wish I could split myself up into separate entities to bankrupt part of so that I can get away Scott free. But alas, I’m a real person, not a company with “personhood.”

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          This is one example of how corporate persons are more persony than human persons.

          Some animals are more equal than others.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Especially because they bought a bunch of companies that weren’t Facebook. Another example is Google rebranding as Alphabet. Those make complete sense.

  • @NoisyOne57
    link
    391 year ago

    Musk previously owned an online banking site known as x.com, which would later merge with PayPal, another service founded by Musk, which then became a separate entity with Musk no longer being involved it.

    And when Musk was forced to complete the purchase of Twitter, he announced plans to make Twitter into a “Super app” like China’s WeChat application, which can be used for payments.

    Musk’s hyperfocus on X might also be because when he was in his twenties, everything “cool” was having an X in it, like XForce and stuff like that.

    He also wanted to create his X Corp company to have a single X as its name, but he couldn’t do that because there was an Alphabet company already using that name.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      711 year ago

      Musk didn’t found PayPal. X.com merged with Confinity, another online financial site (founded by Peter Thiel and others). Confinity had already begun development of PayPal at that time. In the resulting company, still called X.com, there was a series of leadership conflicts, with Musk pushing out CEO Bill Harris to become CEO, before himself being replaced by Peter Thiel. It was under Thiel that the company changed it’s name to PayPal, and later went public. By the time there was a company called “PayPal”, Musk was not longer involved with daily operations.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      everything “cool” was having an X in it, like XForce and stuff like that.

      Like that show Wormhole Xtreme

    • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
      link
      61 year ago

      It feels more 1990s Xtreme! wannabe than anything, but what would I know

  • Vaggumon
    link
    371 year ago

    The simple answer: Elon Musk is a whole lot stupider then he was given credit for.

  • @palebluethought
    link
    331 year ago

    Can we also talk about how absurd that picture at the bottom of the login page is? It looks like something a warez site would have as its landing page in like 2003. Made by some guy named xXx_l33tz3r0_xXx

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Haha, this makes me actually nostalgic thinking about some of the warez sites I frequented back in 2002/2003! Scanning for “pubs” with scetchy software was what I considered a good time back then.

    • thermal_shock
      link
      61 year ago

      Dude I thought the same. Thought it was some stock photo of “hacker”. and absolutel looks like warez from the 90s.

    • @nitefoxOP
      link
      21 year ago

      Oh god just saw it, it reminds of my 12yo self

  • Maharashtra
    link
    291 year ago

    Just Elon Eloning his Elonism to Eloning levels.

    More seriously: Elon decided it’s a good move to rebrand his new toy. Nobody knows for sure what’s going through his head. It’s probably some sort of OCD, or something…

    • LemmyLefty
      link
      91 year ago

      I want to start a rumor that he was just born a Lon but added the E to make himself look cooler.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    With Facebook Threads being the new kid on the block and after all the bad publicity, rebranding Twitter was probably seen as a good PR move.

    • @Viking_Hippie
      link
      41 year ago

      Or it would be in a parallel dimension where reactionary panic moves that are also stupid when seen in isolation would be considered good PR 🤷

  • @ButtholeAnnihilator
    link
    101 year ago

    Elon can never let perceived slights go, like the Thai cave rescuer thing. He wanted PayPal to be called X and lost, now he’s rebuilding it 20 years later.

  • Eochaid
    link
    71 year ago

    And more importantly, who cares?

    • Captain Poofter
      link
      311 year ago

      One of the most recognizeable brands from the past 20 years is suddenly changing it’s branding and throwing all that recognition into the trash. I don’t know why people keep acting like this isn’t worth talking about. I don’t give two shits about musk or Twitter and don’t even have Twitter accounts or whatever, but even I recognize this is a noteworthy change (and his reasons for doing it) for the world.

      • Domille
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I actually do wonder whether he is trying to destroy it on purpose. Every step he’s taken is perplexing if he wanted the platform to actually succeed. Of course it is also possible he is just very very stupid.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          I believe he wants to feel like he created this platform all by himself. He buys platforms and makes them his own. This is just him trying to make Twitter more his own. Ego

      • @nitefoxOP
        link
        21 year ago

        I don’t know why people

        They are edgelords

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Part of me wonders if it’s an attempt to tank the SEO, so people can’t search for or news or easily talk about the site anymore - because it’s been nothing but bad.