• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3528 days ago

      Nope, because he doesn’t care about stuff that doesn’t impact him personally. In the context of Covid, his biggest regret is probably that he got it, followed by the fact that it didn’t kill more Democrats in urban areas during the initial surge.

      • The Pantser
        link
        1528 days ago

        followed by the fact that it didn’t kill more Democrats in urban areas during the initial surge.

        Viruses have a hard time killing people who believe in science and germ theory. COVID deniers on the other hand who are his biggest supporters are stupid and don’t wash their hands.

    • rustydomino
      link
      English
      2928 days ago

      Dude, a conservative headcount for COVID deaths in the US is a million.

    • Maxnmy's
      link
      English
      428 days ago

      No, because he did everything wrong on purpose regarding his handling of COVID.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6528 days ago

    His greatest mistake was hiring people more loyal to the country than to him. That’s his take-away from the experience. And half the country is fine with that and wants him to get another shot at it.

    Fuck.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4228 days ago

    Disloyal man is surprised he is surrounded by disloyal people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2727 days ago

    That would be one of the central problems of fascism. People are hired based on loyalty first, and competence a distant second. On top of that, the fundamental worship of power in fascism means everyone is trying to be powerful, so nobody is all that loyal, anyway.

    It will always fall apart because of this, but it can also kill everyone else in the process.

  • Psaldorn
    link
    20
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Sounds like the hallmark of a very shitty leader. Poor judge of character.

    Unless… he’s just so repugnant that any rational human would end up betraying him because his idea and policies are poisonous to the soul.

    Either way, shit-tier leader.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2028 days ago

    He’s right. The next time, he’ll only have people completely loyal and ready to do massive harm. He never believed he’d win the first time and was completely unprepared. If he wins again, his staff is planned well in advance and we’re fucked.

  • TJA!
    link
    fedilink
    1628 days ago

    Well, yeah, that would be a problem in most cases. Why did he do that? Is he still doing that? Will he do it again if he is reelected? How would he know if they are loyal before hiring them?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      828 days ago

      He didn’t expect to win in 2016. He’s been gearing up for this one with a completely different outlook.

      • @MutilationWave
        link
        328 days ago

        The Heritage Foundation has made the plan, selected the appointees, sealed the deal. He will barely have to make any personnel decisions. It’s fucking terrifying because it will work so well instead of the constant chaos of last time.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      528 days ago

      It’s self filtering. Anyone that’s watched the last 8 years of throwing each and every one of his cronies under the bus, but still jumps at the chance to be next will be loyal enough, at least until he can’t use them anymore.

    • The Pantser
      link
      228 days ago

      How would he know if they are loyal before hiring them?

      Torture until they break.

  • TTimo
    link
    fedilink
    228 days ago

    Kadavergehorsam then. Suits him I guess.

      • TTimo
        link
        fedilink
        327 days ago

        “Corpse-like obedience” - wikipedia has a nice page on it. It was used to describe the zeal of administrative officials in the nazi regime.

  • Media Bias Fact CheckerB
    link
    -728 days ago
    The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
    Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/26/trump-joe-rogan-podcast

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support