• @Hackworth
      link
      English
      192 days ago

      To help blind drivers, no. To help AI, yes.

    • NutWrench
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      So that ‘AI’ car driving software can have an image reference database that relies on people who download porn.

  • @disguy_ovahea
    link
    853 days ago

    I use an app called Be My Eyes to help the visually impaired.

    You’ll get a random notification that a person needs your help. If you’re the first to respond, you’ll be paired up. Their phone camera is displayed on your screen, and you can talk to each other.

    I always have a great experience when I use it.

    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/be-my-eyes/id905177575

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    563 days ago

    They’re not winning over the blind again after they limited access to screen-reader-accessible apps.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 days ago

      On the flip side, training ai for image recognition has the potential for auto labelling images for the blind

      Could be either the website owners themselves generate them if a human written one isn’t provided, or a browser extension that auto labels any unlabelled images on the screen

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        They’re probably going to make a deal with Google to improve Google Lens. Yes, it will eventually help the blind but Reddit’s shareholders will be getting even richer from people’s donated time.

  • circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    32
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    At this point, any request for information could potentially be used as training data. That includes things like captchas.

    I recommend everyone have an extremely literal interpretation of “labor”. Unless you have tremendous insight into where your data is going and how it is being used (and perhaps even then), then assume any ask is ultimately an ask for unpaid labor.

    Obviously you can’t avoid things like captchas, but you can avoid things like this.

    Edit: and it should go without saying, but anything you upload to socials is probably automatic training data at this point. The best approach is simply not to engage with corporate social networks.

    Though Lemmy is not corporately controlled, the information is publically accessible, so even this post is potential training data to be scraped. That is harder to avoid, lest we stop using the internet altogether, but at least avoiding the corpo routes is a good start.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      113 days ago

      Captchas have been for training ai for years that’s nothing new. Iirc the reason you do two is one to confirm you’re human, one for training data

      • @Grimy
        link
        -33 days ago

        I’m sure blind people are happy to have the models that are built with this data, and since both the image and the description are public facing, anyone can use them including open source.

          • @Grimy
            link
            12 days ago

            No. That is what data brokers and big AI companies are pushing for but currently it’s considered fair use.

            Anything public facing can be used for ml and it’s been like that for quite a while. It might change based on all the ongoing lawsuit but I doubt it will, it would be economic suicide and China doesn’t care if it’s “theft”.

            It’s better for us, the consumer in any case, since having to pay for data would kill the open source scene and give openai and the other 3 companies a defecto monopoly.

  • @db2
    link
    43 days ago

    “Huge gay penises”