Summary

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock warned that forcing Ukraine into an unfair peace deal would lead to more war, rejecting any agreement that concedes territory to Russia without security guarantees.

She urged Europe to pressure the U.S. to support its NATO allies. Meanwhile, Trump dismissed Zelensky’s role in peace talks, claiming Ukraine has “no cards” to negotiate.

U.S.-Ukraine relations remain strained, though some American officials signaled continued support.

Trump’s team insists Zelensky will eventually accept a U.S. rare earth mineral deal despite Kyiv’s current resistance.

  • Anarch157a@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    No one will accept a deal with the US for the next 20 years. Zelensky would get a better outcome if he made a pact with the actual Devil than with those bozzos in DC.

  • peregrin5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    24 days ago

    I say this as a US citizen, for AT LEAST the next four years, do not rely on the US for ANYTHING. Even if Trump says you can count on the US, even if he signs a contract in blood, it isn’t worth even wiping your shit with.

    He will give everything to Putin. That’s the only thing you can count on.

    It’s time for a different superpower to pick up the reins or ascend. The EU can become that, but they really need to stop pretending the US is going to do anything for them.

    • SlopppyEngineer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      China has been working toward that superpower status for some time. They’re a lot more ambitious than the leaders in the EU and much more brazen.

      • x00z
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 days ago

        Too bad they are extremely authoritarian.

      • jaybone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 days ago

        I would say they’ve had superpower status since the 1950s, since the wars in Korea and Vietnam.

        • guy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Nukes are cool and all but wouldn’t a super power at least need some over seas power projection like aircraft carriers? I’d say China has been, and still is a regional power albeit rising

          • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            It owns too much of Africa to be a regional power. It’s a superpower even if by a web of alliances/dependants rather than its own military projection

    • foggenbooty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      24 days ago

      Y’all willing to give us a couple hand me down super carriers?

      The rest of the world will pick up the torch, it’s just going to be a long time before we can replace the US due to how large and how stable it’s been in the past. No one really expects an ally to flip the table, of a game they’re winning at, for the lulz.

      • peregrin5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 days ago

        This should be a wake up call to invest in your own carriers and military. Stop letting the US have the monopoly on firepower.

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Germany has relied on the USA since the BRD was founded. The left party (Die Linke) was and still is the only party in parliament that’s against it.

  • Gikiski@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    24 days ago

    Probably ‘extortion’. What has Ukraine done ‘bad (ethically wrong) enough to merit blackmail’?

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      They dared to resist an imperial power. That seems to be the lesson trump wants to teach the world: Don’t dare resist.

      Seems like a fun way to have 20 new nuclear-armed countries by next year.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      Trump did extort zelensky the first time, which resulted in his performative impeachment

  • Glitterbomb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Ukraine should immediately start surface testing nuclear weapons.

      • foggenbooty
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        No one’s ever going to do that again. Trump has guaranteed a new era of nuclear proliferation.

      • alkbch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 days ago

        While the nuclear weapons where physically present on Ukraine soil, the country did not have operational control over them.

        • Lit
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Not all require launch codes. Especially not those delivered by plane. The rest they could dismantle and repurpose.

      • makyo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 days ago

        But they have the capability right? Truly if they wanted to have a nuke I’m positive they could build one.