• @xc2215x
    link
    412 hours ago

    Good for the tech leaders.

  • Laser
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1617 hours ago

    The same shopify that allows nazi merch to be sold? Shocking!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    What would you expect from a company that hems and haws over not selling literal swastika merch.

  • @NOT_RICK_SANCHEZ
    link
    2820 hours ago

    Take a moment to truly analyze which companies take immediate action on this, because this is a great indicator that they are far more dependent on government subsidies than on actual business.

    These are the companies that will have guaranteed back channels for government to get your data, the public show is all a performance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15 hours ago

      I’m not sure what you’re saying here. Are you saying the companies that support DEI are taking government subsidies, or that the company(or companies) that abandon DEI of their own will shortly after the American president targeted it are taking government subsidies? And which government are you referring to, America or Canada?

      • Fushuan [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 hours ago

        They are saying that companies that take action the fastest are the ones most scared of losing government funding, implying that since all businesses want is money, government subsidies are a greater part of their income than the actual business itself. They also say that this also implies that those companies will be the ones to fold first when government asks them for anything like user data.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 hours ago

          Yes, but they’re being very non-specific? Which companies? Spotify, Google and Apple, or the ones condemning the removal of DEI? It can be easily read either way.

          • Fushuan [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Them implying that condemining the removal of DEI would cut subsidies is very backwards while the reverse makes sense, so given the context it’s clear in my mind what they meant.

            Or they are crazy idk.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 hours ago

              Them implying Google or Shopify wouldn’t give or sell information to the government, or try to get government subsidies, is also implausible. But if they state their intention, none of us have to guess.