• @BleatingZombie
      link
      116 hours ago

      You’re right and I hate it. The rich and powerful should have fewer protections. Not more

      • @Droggelbecher
        link
        21 hour ago

        Everyone should be protected from having their consent violated, regardless of how despicable of a human they are. Human rights extend to all. The right to consent is non negotiable. We should just guillotine them instead. Quick and painless, but gruesome enough to set a good example.

    • thermal_shock
      link
      English
      116 hours ago

      We can’t post videos, but he can spew hatred and lies? And his videos of Trump Gaza? Makes sense.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 hours ago

        He never posts on bluesky. That kind of hatred gets you banned there as well. The standards are there.

      • @sploosh
        link
        45 hours ago

        Some people get off on toe sucking and porn is produced featuring it. If you put someone else’s face in porn that they didn’t consent to be in you’re on the wrong side of ethics.

        Those horrible bastards are more wrong and should be stopped, but nonconsentual porn isn’t right.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          120 minutes ago

          If you put someone’s face in anything they didn’t consent to.

          This isn’t porn specific and even if it was, almost everything is someone’s “thing”.

  • @elfin8er
    link
    76 hours ago

    Would the fediverse be able to handle something like this differently?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3810 hours ago

    The non consensual part would be my poor eyes seeing it but I’m not on Bluesky because it’s a corporate imitation of federation

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 hours ago

      Is it? I thought it was just an imitation of Twitter. In what way does it even pretend to be federated?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        96 hours ago

        You can spin up your own Bluesky instance

        …which is still managed by the Bluesky central server and can’t connect to peer instances without that server.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 hours ago

          Where did they say that? I’m not claiming they didn’t, I just haven’t heard about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            36 hours ago

            So, non-federated means one company/organization has full control over some product/service/website (like Twitter, Reddit, etc).

            Federated means that individuals can independently run instances of some product/service/website, and all those instances can talk to one another and share/sync data (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        The tech stuff is above my pay grade but essentially my understanding is the code is open source and one could start their own server on the platform theoretically but no one does

        And yeah, a “federated” (but not in practice) Twitter clone

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10713 hours ago

    Per the original article:

    Update: After this article was published, Bluesky restored Kabas’ post and told 404 Media the following: “This was a case of our moderators applying the policy for non-consensual AI content strictly. After re-evaluating the newsworthy context, the moderation team is reinstating those posts.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4012 hours ago

      Wait, you mean to tell me this meme didn’t have the full context included? Am I to believe that I shouldn’t take memes seriously and get into fights on the internet with strangers?!

    • @MoonlightFox
      link
      37 hours ago

      404media is great as always. Interesting comments about the legality of this.

      • Kraiden
        link
        fedilink
        6512 hours ago

        It was playing on all the screens in a govt. building for 5 minutes. The staff didn’t know how to stop it so someone was running around manually unplugging screens. I’d say that’s pretty newsworthy

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          In essence i agree but in context of the strategy of flooding the media i cant help but feel like for every something like this, which is funny and In some way hopeful but not a ongoing major issue we are missing something else.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1412 hours ago

        It was playing on a ton of government TVs and no one knew how to turn it off. That leads to some articles.

        • greenfire
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 hours ago

          more articles of impeachment for XLVII then? Methinks he’s already attained some kind of record with Guinness, no?

    • @vinyl
      link
      1012 hours ago

      Relax they put it back up

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1911 hours ago

        What does that change? Its about the system and their ability to do so from a central control point. Bluesky was doomed before it started with how it is set up and governed.

        • Lad
          link
          fedilink
          810 hours ago

          Exactly. At least with Mastodon and all Fediverse platforms you don’t have some overlord who can just remove anything on a whim.

          Bluesky was never the solution to the Twitter problem.

          • @MimicJar
            link
            56 hours ago

            Yes you do? If the moderator or admin of your instance doesn’t like something, it’s gone.

            Sure you could post to another instance, but the line of posting to another instance or posting to another service is a thin one.

            I fully agree that Bluesky is far from the distributed haven it might claim to be, but just because it makes a decision that any Fediverse instance might have made doesn’t mean it’s over.

            Bluesky has problems, but those problems are still within the realm of fixable. Fediverse alternatives may be better, but Bluesky is still fine.

            • Lad
              link
              fedilink
              146 minutes ago

              An instance mod isn’t the same as corporate ownership who can purge anything from anywhere at any time.

          • @vinyl
            link
            49 hours ago

            I hope you are joking, you are saying this as if one person runs the entire company lmao

        • @vinyl
          link
          29 hours ago

          deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 hours ago

          All it means is that one moderator made a dumb decision. But I’m sure that’s never been a problem on the fediverse.

        • @vinyl
          link
          49 hours ago

          Dunno why blow it out of proportion, either a moderator with bias or mass reports from fans of their daddy being made fun of, which in return triggered an automatic removal of the post.

    • WolfmanEightySix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 hours ago

      To think people are joining Bluesky like it’s totally different to Xitter…

  • @CMDR_Horn
    link
    1213 hours ago

    I guess this normalizes foot fetishes. They’re gonna be fucked when people start sexually fetishizing people who are fully clothed in photographs

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Huh? I can still see it.

    Edit: oh I see. One of the posts that included the video was deleted for nonconsensual explicit content and then restored after users protested.