• @ZILtoid1991
    link
    27 hours ago

    I wonder how it’s going for the “LGB community”.

  • @Buffalox
    link
    38 hours ago

    I agree on the headline, it’s time for change, we should totally ban traditional marriage. 😋

  • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Before I read it, wonder if Idaho is on there?

    Edit: yep my home state continues to disappoint :/

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3217 hours ago

    And Trump wants to make Canada a part of the U.S. so we can be a part of this hate and bullshit? Yeah go stuff it up your asses. Pathetic and horrible both at the same time.

    I guess it’s bound to happen when you vote in a rapist criminal to lead you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 hours ago

      The intention was always to flood the news with headlines so that the real power grab is obfuscated. Reagan was doing a similar thing when he was running. McDrumpf just turned it up to eleven.

    • @BigTrout75
      link
      English
      313 hours ago

      It’s a waste of time conversation. Only way that would happen is war.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 hours ago

        Let’s go. There are many that would fight our own countrymen to help correct this shit.

        • @warbond
          link
          27 hours ago

          I don’t want to fight my countrymen, I want to fight those assholes in power.

  • Baron Von J
    link
    3118 hours ago

    I mean… Thomas point blank said so after Dobbs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    However, those bills would create a category of legal marriage called "covenant marriage,” which can only take place between a man and a woman, and which generally require premarital counseling and greater restrictions on seeking divorce.

    So are they trying to work around the Full Faith and Credit Clause that says that each state needs to honor the proceedings of other states? To say “that other state doesn’t have covenant marriage, so you can’t divorce from a covenant marriage using that other state’s proceess?”

    Or are they just trying to create some sort of scheme to raise the bar for divorce for people not willing to go out-of-state to get a divorce?

    https://www.divorcenet.com/resources/basic-divorce-residency-requirements-in-your-state.html

    The clearest outlier is Nevada (as discussed below). Physical presence in Nevada for six weeks is enough to meet the residency requirement, even if your permanent home is in another state.

    Like, if you want to get a divorce in Nevada, you can go spend a month-and-a-half in Nevada and then basically disregard whatever your home state’s divorce restrictions are. That’s still a not-inconsiderable barrier, though.

    I’m a little suspicious that if the idea is the former, to create a whole new form of formal relationship so that other states will not permit one to exit the relationship, that probably some other state is going to have some activists go get “covenant marriage” added in that state too…and just have really weak barriers to exit it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    312 hours ago

    Idaho is always on the wrong side of history, but fuck the Dakotas.

    Also, what the fuck is wrong with Michigan these days? Voting for Trump and now this?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      05 hours ago

      Sorry to tell you, but no one is ever on the wrong side of history.

      It just gets written like that by the side that won later…