The DHS quietly updated its policy manual earlier this month, removing LGBTQ+ identities from the section prohibiting surveillance based solely on immutable characteristics.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    22 minutes ago

    Let’s be honest, they were almost certainly already doing that. They’re just getting brazen enough to not hide it anymore.

  • @DragonsInARoom
    link
    38 hours ago

    “I have nothing to hide!” their son in the closet

  • OneMeaningManyNames
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    This is some Gestapo/Stasi shit.

    Like, all queer persons must go beyond Signal/Tor level.

    This extends to the physical world: Plan ahead for escape routes and survival networks.

    I will come back with this angle but, REMEMBER those mfers who always said “the NSA does not target you, so asking about anything more than Signal is paranoid/futile if ever the NSA targets you”?

    REMEMBER that we said that some people have advanced threat models by default? Eg feminist activists, activists in third countries, queer people?

    WHO is paranoid now, that being queer, pro-Palestine, and/or climate activists can have you on the watchlist?

    This development only proves my previous points that the hordes of sock-puppets spamming the Privacy forum are fucking spooks. Pooping the conversation about advanced privacy and anonymity should qualify for permabans, IMHO.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1718 hours ago

    Well to be fair they said to remove all mentions of gender from government documentation. They meant ALL of it.

  • @doodledup
    link
    213 hours ago

    Why is there a blacklist? I feel like it a list of reasons for surveillance should be a whitelist containing criminal activity.