Losing everywhere in courts, so now you think you can just sidestep them by changing the constitution? Lolz

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      They have any and every “right” that no one denies them by actual force of action. The courts will wag their finger and the administration will say “You’re a Marxist, I don’t have to listen to you. Fuck you.”

      :(

        • Zak
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m not sure they think they do legitimately. They probably don’t care about that; they think they can try it and might get away with it for a while.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      “privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”

      That’s the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it.

      It’s not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        I dunno.

        The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts.

        I think it’s 7-2 against trump.

    • paraphrand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sounds like it.

      For the new people: Anarchy just means no hierarchy. Not being a dick. Remember that.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Anarchy should always be the goal.

      I think you mean disobedience or resistance?

      • DreamButt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Anarchy for the average person is not about political anarchy but just a word to mean chaos

      • GreenBottles
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Hah, well, I was kind of paraphrasing a quote in my head I guess. But yes. You are correct.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    They go this route then the protests every weekend here will become a different kind of rodeo.

    If I’m there to peacefully protest and all of a sudden they can grab you a basically kill you (because let’s face it it you get sent to El Salvador or Libia was it? You are dead. You are not getting out), people start packing and right fully so. Miller is a fucking moron and a scum bag.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Good! The Founders CLEARLY only Wrote the Constitution to Protect SCHOOL SHOOTERS and LITERALLY nothing Else! So EVERY OTHER PART of the Constitution like writ of habeas corpus can ACTUALLY be IGNORED!

    BUT you DARE NOT IGNORE the Part that allows ME, a PRO LIFE REPUBLICAN, to SHOOT UP AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL!