• @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      At this point I’m just reading the Playtest material out of morbid curiosity. I’ve already switched to Pathfinder.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        Pathfinder 2e made me realize I wasn’t actually sick of crunchier rules, I was just sick of fighting the rules. I have to make up for weird quirks and omissions all the time when I DM 5e, but with Pathfinder 2e, everything actually clicks together the way I’d expect.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m so frustrated that 5e’s design goal puts SO MUCH emphasis on balance, for encounters and between players, but is consistently so bad at it.

    And look at half of the memes here and you’ll see how bad they are at precise technical writing. Which is weird, because the M:tG folks are great at it, and they’re right next door.

  • @loki_d20
    link
    61 year ago

    Well, at least kensei might become something people actually play.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    I don’t get this. I always took the counterbalance of the extra versatility of the monk, ranger, paladin, and, to a lesser extent, the bard, were having 3 primary ability scores instead of 2. There’s zero need to nerf them further.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I can only assume that WotC heard complaints about that one time that an enemy rolled a bunch of 1s to Save against Stunning Strike and “ruined the campaign” by DMs who don’t know jack about encounter design and didn’t notice Stunning Strike doing squat the rest of the time. There’s a weirdly vocal group of people who think Monk is OP.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Seriously. I played a monk, and while Stunning Strike came in clutch sometimes, it was balanced by (a) depending on the opponent failing a save, and (b) using up ki, which will run out over a longer encounter.

        Plus, as a DM, I never really had a problem with the players pulling off a huge upset like that. 5e is heroic fantasy, so let them be big damn heroes sometimes. They won’t always be! (Though I do play up as though I’m shocked and frustrated, but that’s just to play the heel and let them feel extra victorious. :P)

      • Khrux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Honestly I support the weakening of stunning strike specifically. The monk shouldn’t be crap with the exception of one ability that is so encounter breaking that many DMs are weakening it anyway.

        The monk should have been buffed otherwise of course but the modifications to stunning strike are more or less required.

  • GolGolarion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    damn, someones got a grudge against monks at wotc. I remember my one foray into monk back when i played 5e was pretty miserable, now they’re becoming worse?