• Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 hours ago

    We’re not selling our data, we’re giving it freely to our sister company incorporated as an LLC in Texas! (or some other location where the law becomes unenforcable.)

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      don’t get me wrong I like the direction it’s going but loopholes are gonna always exist, and proving this happens is about as easy as proving someone pirated software by setting up a sftp server and giving the credentials to a buddy… and they could simply ship backup tapes to somewhere as an offsite copy and make it completely impossible to figure out.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Rather than make just a ban I would support making a bounty where if you can provide evidence to law enforcement that a company has been illegally firehosing personally identifiable and precise location data of someone onto the internet you can submit evidence of this to a government agency and receive a bounty for it.

    You don’t have to have any connection with the person, you simply have to prove that you can find more precise location data about someone than you should be able to do and identify the company that allowed the illegal data collection and dissemination to happen.

  • slazer2au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    And watch as every company in the world ignores the law because what are you going to do about it?

    • lectricleopard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, theyll make more money than it costs them. If they even get caught.