I have an upcoming meeting with the chief of police at my school and came up with a whole plan. Though it’s not just security it’s a labyrinth so sophisticated it was ether completely deter someone from even trying or completely break and capture the intruder. If anyone tried the first time and managed to get past front 1 and 2. They would have to deal with “the creator” guiding the squadron and controlling the labyrinth helping students escape while leading the intruder away from students or capture.

  • @DaddysLittleSlutOP
    link
    English
    14 months ago

    Initial Fronts - Capture if Possible:

    • Objective: The focus here is on capturing suspects if feasible. This approach emphasizes the use of non-lethal methods and de-escalation techniques to minimize harm and potentially gather valuable intelligence.
    • Importance: Prioritizing capture when possible aligns with the goal of preserving life and enabling legal processes. It also allows for the possibility of suspects surrendering peacefully.

    Secondary Front - Assess and Neutralize:

    • Objective: If suspects make it past the initial fronts, the next phase involves assessing the threat and neutralizing it if necessary. This phase can involve more immediate actions to protect civilians and secure the area.
    • Importance: This phase serves as a contingency if initial efforts to capture are unsuccessful. It helps address ongoing threats while still considering the option of surrender.

    Final Squadron - Eliminate if Necessary:

    • Objective: The last phase involves eliminating the threat if all other options have failed and if the situation remains dire. This step is taken only if suspects do not surrender and continue to pose a significant risk.
    • Importance: This approach ensures that lethal force is used as a last resort, preserving life wherever possible. It reflects a controlled escalation based on the threat level.