I won’t reveal who reports who, but I will say it was someone else.
The civility rule is NOT ambiguous:
“Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.”
i was wondering what you said since i can only see that it was removed.
i’ve used milderer sarcasm than you have and my own comments have likewise been removed; i suspect that the fraught relationship that lemmy.world has with the rest of the lemmyverse is fueling overzealous moderation.
Did @[email protected] report me?
Either way, it was sarcasm
the caustic use of words, often in a humorous way, to mock someone or something
I won’t reveal who reports who, but I will say it was someone else.
The civility rule is NOT ambiguous:
“Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.”
Removed by mod
It literally doesn’t matter who reported it, you broke the civility rule. Had I come across the comment organically I still would have removed it.
Don’t attack other users. Full stop.
Removed by mod
Now you’re arguing with a mod after a civility violation. Temp banned.
On further review, this appears to be a ban evading account of sunzu. Perma banned.
i was wondering what you said since i can only see that it was removed.
i’ve used milderer sarcasm than you have and my own comments have likewise been removed; i suspect that the fraught relationship that lemmy.world has with the rest of the lemmyverse is fueling overzealous moderation.
Yeah I figured you would have picked up on it based on your comments
It was something along the lines: “but have you thought about the right of rich Americans to defend themselves, ****Lord”